Anti-racism in postgraduate medical curricula
Sharma, C.; Nacer, H.; Koay, A.; McKee, M.; Devakumar, D.
Show abstract
Racism is a public health threat and is firmly ingrained in the healthcare system. The reasons for this are complex as racism is rooted in historical, political, economic and social structures of society. To improve the health of their patients and the public, doctors must be able to recognise, name and act on the impact of racism. This study aims to understand action taken by postgraduate medical organisations in the UK in the aftermath of the global public reckoning of structural racism and its longstanding impacts on societal health in 2020. We analysed the public statements made by postgraduate medical organisations and then how this relates to the learning outcomes that doctors in training need to complete. We found that while many institutions (n=14) issued public commitments to anti-racism, reviewing the content of all GMC-approved postgraduate curricula (n=102) shows that the majority of UK doctors are receiving minimal or no education or training in anti-racism. As such, we call institutions involved in postgraduate medical education to include anti-racism competencies in medical curricula to support doctors to develop the skills, behaviours and knowledge to name and address the role of racism in health inequalities.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for capturing and measuring doctor well-being? A Delphi study 93%
- The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings 93%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘Admissions to paediatric medical wards with a primary mental health diagnosis: a systematic review of the literature’ 88%
- Deficits in planned hospital care for vulnerable adolescents in England during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of linked administrative data 88%
- Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric health-care use and severe disease: a retrospective national cohort study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review 90%
- A Systematic Examination of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Usage Guidelines for Scholarly Publishing in Medical Journals 88%
- Projected geographic disparities in healthcare worker absenteeism from COVID-19 school closures and the economic feasibility of child care subsidies: a simulation study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 95%
- Participant perceptions of disability training for health workers: a qualitative study in Ghana 92%
- Evaluating the inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer-related content in graduate medical education: a national survey of program directors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 92%
- The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia 92%
- Mapping young people’s journeys through mental health services: a prospective longitudinal qualitative study protocol 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.