Back

Defining epithelial stem cell heterogeneity through undulating structures of the skin and oral mucosa

Ishikawa, M.; Ngo, Y. X.; Nishikawa, I.; Kato, H.; Maeda, R.; Mizuno, R.; Mizuno, J.; Izumi, K.; Yanagisawa, H.; Sada, A.

2025-01-22 developmental biology
10.1101/2025.01.21.634195 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epithelial stem cells exhibit heterogeneity, with distinct stem cell populations occupying specific tissue regions. The human skin displays a characteristic undulating structure at the epidermal-dermal junction, which supports mechanical strength and influences the spatial organization of epithelial stem cells. Unlike human skin, mouse skin lacks these undulations, complicating studies into the effects of tissue architecture on stem cell distribution. Here, we leverage the mouse oral mucosa, which possesses an undulating structure similar to human skin, to characterize stem cell division dynamics and long-term fate in vivo. Using a combination of H2B-GFP pulse-chase analysis and lineage tracing with Dlx1-CreER and Slc1a3-CreER models, we demonstrate that slow-and fast-cycling stem cells localize to distinct anatomical regions relative to the undulating structure and maintain their respective compartments during tissue homeostasis. A three-dimensional culture model using micropatterned collagen scaffolds that recapitulate the undulating structures in vitro reveals that the mechanical environment generated by the undulating structures partially induces proliferative heterogeneity in epithelial stem cells. This study proposes tissue undulating surface structure as a common principle as a niche component that defines the localization of compartmentalized stem cell populations across different epithelial tissues. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=123 SRC="FIGDIR/small/634195v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (40K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b3046aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e6cd8forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c169ccorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8f772_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.