Back

Multi-omics reveals global signaling rewiring and identifies Activin A-induced dysregulation of FOS/Activator Protein 1 as a novel target in Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva

Wits, M.; Gomez-Suarez, N.; Lopez, A. D.; Farfan, N.; Bekedam, F.; Sampadi, B.; Rotman, S.; Lopez, D. R.; Marquez, J. B.; Arendzen, C.; Freund, C.; Veelen, P. v.; Valldeperas, A. L.; Man, F. d.; Ventura, F.; Goumans, M.-J.; Sanchez-Duffhues, G.

2025-01-21 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.01.21.634061 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is caused by an activating mutation (p.R206H) in the type I BMP receptor ALK2, leading to heterotopic ossification (HO) in soft connective tissues. While aberrant Activin A-induced SMAD signaling is central in FOP pathogenesis, global signaling alterations remain poorly understood. MethodsWe performed phosphoproteomics, transcriptomics and biochemical analyses in mesenchymal cells (MSCs) overexpressing wild-type ALK2WT or mutant ALK2R206H receptors and in induced-MSCs derived from FOP patient iPSCs. Findings were validated in vivo using FOP-like mouse models and in vitro via pharmacological interventions. ResultsMulti-omics analyses revealed previously unrecognized signaling networks in ALK2R206H cells, including enhanced MAPK, mTOR, RUNX2 and RHO-mediated mechanotransduction pathways. Notably, we identified dysregulated Activator Protein-1 (AP-1) expression and function as a novel contributor to FOP. AP-1 factors were highly enriched in HO lesions in FOP-like animals. Pharmacological inhibition of AP-1 significantly reduced osteochondrogenic differentiation in vitro. ConclusionThis study highlights global signaling dysregulation in FOP and identifies AP-1 as a critical driver and potential therapeutic target for FOP.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.