Back

De novo design of epitope-specific antibodies against soluble and multipass membrane proteins with high specificity, developability, and function

Nabla Bio, ; Biswas, S.

2025-01-22 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.01.21.633066 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present JAM, a generative protein design system that enables fully computational design of antibodies with therapeutic-grade properties for the first time. JAM generates antibodies de novo in both single-domain (VHH) and paired (scFv/mAb) antibody formats that achieve double-digit nanomolar affinities, strong early-stage developability profiles, and precise epitope targeting without experimental optimization. We demonstrate JAMs capabilities across multiple therapeutic contexts, including the first fully computationally designed antibodies to multipass membrane proteins - Claudin-4 and CXCR7. Against SARS-CoV-2, JAM-designed antibodies achieved sub-nanomolar pseudovirus neutralization potency, with early stage developability metrics achieving established clinical benchmarks. We show that increasing test-time computation by allowing JAM to iteratively introspect on its outputs substantially improves both binding success rates and affinities, representing the first evidence that test-time compute scaling may extend to physical protein design systems. The entire process from design to recombinant characterization requires <6 weeks, and multiple targets can be pursued in parallel with minimal additional experimental overhead. These results establish de novo antibody design as a practical approach for therapeutic discovery, offering paths to both improved efficiency in standard workflows and new opportunities for previously intractable targets. Disclaimer: While we provide detailed descriptions of experimental methods and success metrics, we choose not disclose methodological details of JAM for commercial reasons.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.