Back

Homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma by self-reported race

Lawson-Michod, K. A.; Johnson, C. E.; Barnard, M. E.; Davidson, N.; Collin, L. J.; Nix, D.; Huff, C.; Berchuck, A.; Salas, L. A.; Greene, C.; Marks, J. R.; Peres, L.; Doherty, J.; Schildkraut, J. M.

2025-01-28 oncology
10.1101/2025.01.21.25320918 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundApproximately half of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) have homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, HRD is not well-characterized in Black individuals. ObjectiveTo characterize HGSC HRD by self-reported race and evaluate whether differences in HRD are associated with ovarian cancer mortality. Study populationCohort study using data collected from two population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer. Cases were selected based on self-reported race (178 Black, 123 White) and pathologically-confirmed HGSC. ExposuresHRD features identified using matched tumor-normal whole-exome DNA sequencing and categorized as germline or somatic variants in homologous recombination pathway genes, or the SBS3 HRD-associated signature. OutcomesMedian difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for age at diagnosis and tumor mutation burden, and age and stage-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95%CIs for survival, comparing individuals with an HRD feature to those without, separately by self-reported race. ResultsMore of the germline and somatic variants detected among Black individuals compared with White individuals were unannotated or variants of uncertain significance (VUS; germline 65% versus 45%; somatic 62% versus 50%, respectively). While the prevalences of many HRD features were similar between Black individuals and White individuals, Black individuals had a higher prevalence of the HRD signature identified using de novo mutational signature analysis (40% versus 29%) and germline BRCA2 variants (8% versus 2%) compared with White individuals. We observed that among Black individuals, BRCA2 variants were associated with better survival (somatic HR=0.23, 95%CI 0.07-0.76; germline HR=0.48, 95%CI 0.22-1.03), while germline BRCA1 variants were associated with worse survival (HR=2.11, 95%CI 1.14-3.88). When we restricted to VUS and unannotated variants, we observed similar associations with survival for BRCA2 among Black individuals (somatic HR=0.18, 95%CI 0.04-0.75; germline HR=0.40, 95%CI 0.15-1.09). Conclusions and RelevanceHRD testing informs precision-based medicine approaches that improve outcomes, but a higher proportion of VUS among Black individuals may complicate referral for such care. Our findings emphasize the importance of recruiting diverse individuals in genomics research and better characterizing VUS.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
5
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
7
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
12
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
15
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
20
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%