Advancing the prediction and understanding of placebo responses in chronic back pain using large language models
A.P. Nunes, D.; Furer, D.; Berger, S.; Cecchi, G.; Ferreira-Gomes, J.; Neto, F.; Martins de Matos, D.; Apkarian, A. V.; Branco, P.
Show abstract
Placebo analgesia in chronic pain is a widely studied clinical phenomenon, where expectations about the effectiveness of a treatment can result in substantial pain relief when using an inert treatment agent. While placebos offer an opportunity for non-pharmacological treatment in chronic pain, not everyone demonstrates an analgesic response. Prior research has identified biopsychosocial factors that determine the likelihood of an individual to respond to a placebo, yet generalizability and ecological validity in those studies have been limited due to the inability to account for dynamic personal and treatment effects--which are well-known to play a role. Here, we assessed the potential of using fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) to predict placebo responders in chronic low-back pain using contextual features extracted from patient interviews, as they speak about their lifestyle, pain, and treatment history. We re-analyzed data from two clinical trials where individuals performed open-ended interviews and used these to develop a predictive model of placebo response. Our findings demonstrate that semantic features extracted with LLMs accurately predicted placebo responders, achieving a classification accuracy of 74% in unseen data, and validating with 70% accuracy in an independent cohort. Further, LLMs eliminated the need for pre-selecting search terms or to use dictionary approaches, enabling a fully data-driven approach. This LLM method further provided interpretable insights into psychosocial factors underlying placebo responses, highlighting nuanced linguistic patterns linked to responder status, which tap into semantic dimensions such as "anxiety," "resignation," and "hope." These findings expand on prior research by integrating state-of-art NLP techniques to address limitations in interpretability and context sensitivity of standard methods like bag-of-words and dictionary-based approaches. This method highlights the role of language models to link language and psychological states, paving the way for a deeper yet quantitative exploration of biopsychosocial phenomena, and to understand how they relate to treatment outcomes, including placebo.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Explainable deep learning for disease activity prediction in chronic inflammatory joint diseases 92%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 91%
- Sociodemographically Differential Patterns of Chronic Pain Progression Revealed by Analyzing the All of Us Research Program Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal policy determination in sequential systemic and locoregional therapy of oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas: A patient-physician digital twin dyad with deep Q-learning for treatment selection 92%
- One LLM is not Enough: Harnessing the Power of Ensemble Learning for Medical Question Answering 90%
- Structured Codes and Free-Text Notes: Measuring Information Complementarity in Electronic Health Records 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use 93%
- Effects of Savoring Meditation on Positive Emotions and Pain-Related Brain Function: A Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis 93%
- Real Bodies Not Required? Placebo Analgesia and Pain Perception in Immersive Virtual and Augmented Reality 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 92%
- Validity of the Cold Pressor Test and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire via online self-administration 91%
- Failure to modulate reward prediction errors in declarative learning with theta (6 Hz) frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.