Back

Characterisation of a touchscreen-based Go/No Go task for assessing cognitive judgement bias in mice: a new translational tool for affective state disorder drug screening.

Lopez-Cruz, L.; Phillips, B. U.; Saksida, L. M.; Heath, C. J.; Bussey, T. J.

2025-01-20 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.01.20.633915 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A major obstacle in the pre-clinical study of mood-related disorders and novel affective state therapeutic evaluation is the lack of animal models that fully recapitulate human symptomatology. In this study, we developed a touchscreen-based Go/No Go cognitive judgement bias (CJB) task for mice. In this task, animals first learned to discriminate between two visual stimuli displayed on the touchscreen: one associated with a reward (S+) and one associated with a time-out and flashing house light (S-). Once mice learned to respond to the S+ and to withhold responding to the S- consistently, a set of four ambiguous stimuli ranging in visual similarity to the S+ and S- stimuli were randomly interspersed in the stimulus presentation sequence. Responses to these ambiguous stimuli were interpreted as a greater expectation of positive ( optimistic bias) or negative ( pessimistic bias) outcomes as a function of their similarity to the S+ or S- stimuli. The acute administration of the SSRIs fluoxetine and citalopram and the 5HT-2C receptor antagonist SB204048 did not produce any effects on CJB task performance. However, the noradrenaline/dopamine reuptake inhibitor, bupropion, increased responses to the ambiguous stimuli consistent with induction of an optimistic bias and the pro-depressant tetrabenazine yielded the opposite effect. This study underscores the capacity of mice to respond to visually ambiguous stimuli in an ambiguity-dependent manner, a phenomenon observed across various species, including humans. Furthermore, it establishes and validates an operant behavioural task to assess CJB in mice delivered using the touchscreen platform which has significant intrinsic cross-species translational potential.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
3
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
14
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
17
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
21
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%