A comprehensive quality control pipeline in human microbiome research for large population studies
Li, R.; A.M. Verlouw, J.; G. Boer, C.; Arp, P.; van Meurs, J.; G. Uitterlinden, A.; Kraaij, R.; Medina-Gomez, C.
Show abstract
AbstractThe widespread application of high-throughput Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies has made microbiome research an emerging field in public health and biomedical sciences. However, there are still many challenges that need to be addressed in this field. Pipelines available to generate microbiome data across cohorts are diverse, and sources of variation to be recorded and evaluated during microbiome profiling have not been standardized. Moreover, meticulous quality control of the microbiome data processing, from collection to computational quantification is still challenging, especially in large population studies. Innovative approaches are required to handle samples and to minimize the potential bias introduced by logistic hurdles in biobanking. In this paper, we describe the methodological steps surrounding the optimization of the 16s rRNA gut microbiome profiling in two large prospective cohorts the Generation R Study (mean age 9.83 {+/-} 0.32 years) and the Rotterdam Study (mean age 62.67 {+/-} 5.66 years). This paper also highlights potential solutions to sample mislabeling in large-scale microbiome analysis. To summarize, our study addresses common problems in human microbiome research. It aims to improve the research quality and reliability by integrating more stringent quality control standards into microbiome research.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single cell genome sequencing of laboratory mouse microbiota improves taxonomic and functional resolution of this model microbial community 95%
- Long-read sequencing to interrogate strain-level variation among adherent-invasive Escherichia coli isolated from human intestinal tissue 95%
- Variant calling for cpn60 barcode sequence-based microbiome profiling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, swab and mucosal tissue samples 96%
- Using fecal immunochemical tubes for the analysis of gut microbiome has potential to improve colorectal cancer screening 95%
- Meta-analysis of Microbiome Association Networks Reveal Patterns of Dysbiosis in Diseased Microbiomes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Strong pathogen competition in neonatal gut colonisation 95%
- The South American MicroBiome Archive (saMBA): Enriching the healthy microbiome concept by evaluating uniqueness and biodiversity of neglected populations 94%
- A standardized gnotobiotic mouse model harboring a minimal 15-member mouse gut microbiota recapitulates SOPF/SPF phenotypes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.