Barriers and facilitators to specialist service referrals for sleep disorders from healthcare professionals perspective: A scoping review of qualitative research evidence
Sykorova, M.; Nolte, E.; Martineau, F.; Miller, M. A.; Eriksson, S. H.; Quinnell, T. G.; Smith, I. E.; Strongman, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccess to specialist sleep centres can lead to timely diagnosis and management of sleep disorders, improving the health and quality of life of people with these conditions. Evidence describing factors that influence referral to specialist sleep services is needed to inform improvements to the referral process. ObjectiveThis scoping review identifies and summarises qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to referrals to specialist sleep services by healthcare professionals. Eligibility criteriaThe review considered qualitative studies published in any language between 1995-2024 that explore the barriers and/or facilitators to referral to specialist services for sleep-related disorders from healthcare care professionals perspective. Sources of evidenceA systematic search of six databases (Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and Open Grey) was conducted. ResultsOut of 3507 records, seven heterogeneous studies from two countries (Australia and USA) and one multi-country study met the inclusion criteria. Referrals were from a range of settings including primary care (two studies). Major themes identified as influencing referral included clarity of roles, referral experiences and options, knowledge of sleep disorders, funding, and views on treatment. Specific barriers and facilitators varied between countries, healthcare professionals and sleep disorders. ConclusionsAlthough specific barriers and facilitators vary between settings, cross-cutting themes influencing referral to sleep centres reflect a lack of awareness of sleep disorders among healthcare professionals, poorly defined referral pathways, and funding issues. ImpactsThis is the first scoping review to synthesise qualitative evidence on factors influencing referrals to specialist services for sleep disorders. The themes identified can be used in further research to inform improvements to referral pathways in different settings. Reporting MethodAdherence to the PRISMA-ScR checklist was maintained.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Creation of a Shortened Version of the of the Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (SDQ) 94%
- Working nights and lower leisure-time physical activity associate with chronic pain in Southern African truck drivers: a cross-sectional study 93%
- Home-EEG assessment of possible compensatory mechanisms for sleep disruption in highly irregular shift workers - The ANCHOR study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of mindfulness meditation and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea with residual excessive sleepiness: A randomized controlled pilot study 94%
- Obstructive sleep apnea is highly prevalent in COVID19 moderate to severe ARDS survivors: Findings of level I Polysomnography in a tertiary care hospital 93%
- Characterizing Sleep Disorders in an Autism-Specific Collection of Electronic Health Records 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Burnout and sleep problems among nurses working in a tertiary hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal 91%
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 89%
- Anaesthesia delivery systems in low and lower-middle-income Asian countries: a scoping review of capacity and effectiveness 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Internet-based health survey on loneliness and sleep-related problems among the working-age population in Japan during COVID-19 92%
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 89%
- Study Protocol and Rationale of “The UP Project”: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Active Breaks on Health Indicators in Desk-Based Workers 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.