Back

Virus infection significantly decreases insect fitness: a meta-analysis

Cesar, C. S.; Miranda, V. H.; Silveira, E. R.; de Oliveira, T. A.; Cogni, R.

2025-01-22 ecology
10.1101/2025.01.19.633787 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Organisms are constantly at risk of being infected by pathogens such as viruses. Adaptations against viral infection include immune defenses encoded within the host genome and associations with defensive symbionts such as Wolbachia. Wolbachia is widely spread among insects, and its success in nature may be due to its antiviral effects, which can benefit hosts if viruses significantly reduce host fitness. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the degree to which viral infection affects the fitness of insect hosts, and which factors may influence the impact of viral infection on hosts such as if the insect host is a vector or not of viruses that cause diseases in humans and plants, and if the insect is a new or a natural host of a specific virus. We gathered 1,040 effect sizes from 150 studies. Our results show that viruses significantly reduce host fitness, especially their survival. The decrease in host fitness is higher in non-vector than in vector insects, and we found no difference in fitness decrease caused by viral infection between new and natural hosts. Moreover, we found that fitness effects caused by viruses vary between host order and fitness components. In conclusion, our results show that viruses exert severe harmful effects on hosts by decreasing their fitness. In this context, harboring symbionts that confer antiviral protection, such as Wolbachia, can be highly advantageous for hosts, enhancing their fitness. Conversely, Wolbachia can benefit from the presence of viruses, facilitating its spread in insect populations by offering antiviral protection.

Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · published here
393 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.6%
2
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.7%
4
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
5
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
8
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
9
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
12
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
16
Journal of General Virology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
Parasitology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Journal of Virology
499 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%