Pregnancy-related risk and birth setting trends: Insights from Indonesian Demographic Health Survey data
Hodgkin, K.; Joshy, G.; Lokuge, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundMost maternal and neonatal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries and are largely preventable with quality care. In Indonesia, 98% of pregnant people receive antenatal care and birth commonly occurs in community settings or hospitals. Outside of high-income countries, few studies identify where women with pregnancy-related risk factors give birth. Accurate identification of pregnancy risk factors and referral to an appropriate birth setting is considered an essential element of quality antenatal care, though its efficacy in Indonesia is unknown. MethodsThis study aimed to identify suitable indicators of pregnancy risk factors for Indonesia and examine population-level patterns in pregnancy-related risk, care and appropriateness of birth setting. Risk factors in pregnancy based on internationally relevant referral guidelines were identified from literature search and mapped to available indicators. Using self-reported data from three waves of the Indonesian Demographic Health Survey (2007, 2012, 2017), a representative survey of women aged 15-49 years, we examined receipt of maternity care, prevalence of pregnancy risk factors and time trends in birth setting, overall and by presence of risk factors. ResultsIn the weighted sample (n=43,846), one quarter of women reported pregnancy risk factors. From 2002-2017, numbers of births in hospitals have doubled and births at home have halved. However, the proportions of women with pregnancy risk in each setting remains largely unchanged. DiscussionThese findings identify opportunities for shifting care in Indonesia to ensure women are receiving the appropriate level of care at birth.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification and Mitigation of High-Risk Pregnancy with the Community Maternal Danger Score Mobile Application in Gboko, Nigeria 98%
- Level of completion along continuum of care for maternal and child health services and factors associated with it among women in Arba Minch Zuria Woreda, Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study 97%
- Adoption of policies to improve respectful maternity care in Timor-Leste 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on National Survey Data 96%
- Exploring Multilevel Determinants of Stillbirth: A Comprehensive Analysis Across Sub-Saharan African Countries 96%
- Cost saving in primary versus tertiary level of reproductive health services in Sana’a, Yemen 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of facility-based childbirth among adolescents and young women in Guinea: a secondary analysis of the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey 97%
- Quality of newborn care and associated factors: An analysis of the 2022 Kenya demographic and health survey 97%
- Availability of Priority Maternal and Newborn Health Indicators: Cross-sectional Analysis of Pregnancy, Childbirth and Postnatal Care Registers from 21 Countries 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal and perinatal characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies complicated with COVID-19 in Kuwait 96%
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 95%
- The prevalence of mental ill-health in women during pregnancy and after childbirth during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Systematic review and Meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone 94%
- The Red Thread: Stakeholder Perspectives on Menstrual Health and Hygiene in Ghana 94%
- A double-edged sword - Telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: Findings from a global mixed methods study of healthcare providers 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.