Gene expression patterns of the developing human face at single cell resolution reveal cell type contributions to normal facial variation and disease risk
Khouri-Farah, N.; Winchester, E. W.; Schilder, B. M.; Robinson, K.; Curtis, S. W.; Skene, N. M.; Leslie-Clarkson, E.; Cotney, J.
Show abstract
Craniofacial development gives rise to the complex structures of the face and involves the interplay of diverse cell types. Despite its importance, our understanding of human-specific craniofacial developmental mechanisms and their genetic underpinnings remains limited. Here, we present a comprehensive single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) atlas of human craniofacial development from craniofacial tissues of 24 embryos that span six key time points during the embryonic period (4-8 post-conception weeks). This resource resolves the transcriptional dynamics of seven major cell types and uncovers distinct major cell types, including muscle progenitors and cranial neural crest cells (CNCCs), as well as dozens of subtypes of ectoderm and mesenchyme. Comparative analyses reveal substantial conservation of major cell types, alongside human biased differences in gene expression programs. CNCCs, which play a crucial role in craniofacial morphogenesis, exhibit the lowest marker gene conservation, underscoring their evolutionary plasticity. Spatial transcriptomics further localizes cell populations, providing a detailed view of their developmental roles and anatomical context. We also link these developmental processes to genetic variation, identifying cell type-specific enrichments for common variants associated with facial morphology and rare variants linked to orofacial clefts. Intriguingly, Neanderthal-introgressed sequences are enriched near genes with biased expression in cartilage and specialized ectodermal subtypes, suggesting their contribution to modern human craniofacial features. This atlas offers unprecedented insights into the cellular and genetic mechanisms shaping the human face, highlighting conserved and distinctly human aspects of craniofacial biology. Our findings illuminate the developmental origins of craniofacial disorders, the genetic basis of facial variation, and the evolutionary legacy of ancient hominins. This work provides a foundational resource for exploring craniofacial biology, with implications for developmental genetics, evolutionary biology, and clinical research into congenital anomalies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Syndrome-informed phenotyping identifies a polygenic background for achondroplasia-like facial variation in the general population 96%
- The developing mouse coronal suture at single-cell resolution 96%
- Joint Multi-Ancestry and Admixed GWAS Reveals the Complex Genetics behind Human Cranial Vault Shape 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- L1 retrotransposons drive human neuronal transcriptome complexity and functional diversification 95%
- Chronic exposure to glucocorticoids amplifies inhibitory neuron cell fate during human neurodevelopment in organoids 94%
- 7q11.23 Syndromes Reveal BAZ1B as a Master Regulator of the Modern Human Face and Validate the Self-Domestication Hypothesis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Origin of Ewing sarcoma by embryonic reprogramming of neural crest to mesoderm 95%
- YAP1 is a key regulator of EWS::FLI1-dependent malignant transformation upon IGF-1 mediated reprogramming of bone mesenchymal stem cells 94%
- Netrin1 patterns the dorsal spinal cord through modulation of Bmp signaling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Resolving the three-dimensional interactome of Human Accelerated Regions during human and chimpanzee neurodevelopment 95%
- Simultaneous CRISPR screening and spatial transcriptomics reveals intracellular, intercellular, and functional transcriptional circuits. 94%
- DNA-guided transcription factor cooperativity shapes face and limb mesenchyme 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.