Pervasive and programmed nucleosome distortion patterns on single mammalian chromatin fibers
Yang, M. G.; Richter, H. J.; Wang, S.; McNally, C. P.; Harris, N.; Dhillon, S.; Maresca, M.; de Wit, E.; Willenbring, H.; Maher, J.; Goodarzi, H.; Ramani, V.
Show abstract
We present a genome-scale method to map the single-molecule co-occupancy of structurally distinct nucleosomes, subnucleosomes, and other protein-DNA interactions via long-read high-resolution adenine methyltransferase footprinting. Iteratively Defined Lengths of Inaccessibility (IDLI) classifies nucleosomes on the basis of shared patterns of intranucleosomal accessibility, into: i.) minimally-accessible chromatosomes; ii.) octasomes with stereotyped DNA accessibility from superhelical locations (SHLs) {+/-}1 through {+/-}7; iii.) highly-accessible unwrapped nucleosomes; and iv.) subnucleosomal species, such as hexasomes, tetrasomes, and other short DNA protections. Applying IDLI to mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) chromatin, we discover widespread nucleosomal distortion on individual mammalian chromatin fibers, with >85% of nucleosomes surveyed displaying degrees of intranucleosomally accessible DNA. We observe epigenomic-domain-specific patterns of distorted nucleosome co-occupancy and positioning, including at enhancers, promoters, and mouse satellite repeat sequences. Nucleosome distortion is programmed by the presence of bound transcription factors (TFs) at cognate motifs; occupied TF binding sites are differentially decorated by distorted nucleosomes compared to unbound sites, and degradation experiments establish direct roles for TFs in structuring binding-site proximal nucleosomes. Finally, we apply IDLI in the context of primary mouse hepatocytes, observing evidence for pervasive nucleosomal distortion in vivo. Further genetic experiments reveal a role for the hepatocyte master regulator FOXA2 in directly impacting nucleosome distortion at hepatocyte-specific regulatory elements in vivo. Our work suggests extreme--but regulated--plasticity in nucleosomal DNA accessibility at the single-molecule level. Further, our study offers an essential new framework to model transcription factor binding, nucleosome remodeling, and cell-type specific gene regulation across biological contexts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Histone exchange sensors reveal variant specific dynamics in mouse embryonic stem cells 98%
- Fine-mapping of nuclear compartments using ultra-deep Hi-C shows that active promoter and enhancer elements localize in the active A compartment even when adjacent sequences do not 98%
- Global mapping of RNA-chromatin contacts reveals a proximity-dominated connectivity model for ncRNA-gene interactions 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- ChIP-DIP: A multiplexed method for mapping hundreds of proteins to DNA uncovers diverse regulatory elements controlling gene expression 98%
- Dynamic network-guided CRISPRi screen reveals CTCF loop-constrained nonlinear enhancer-gene regulatory activity in cell state transitions 97%
- DeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of enhancers 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Massively parallel characterization of transcriptional regulatory elements in three diverse human cell types 97%
- A human DNA methylation atlas reveals principles of cell type-specific methylation and identifies thousands of cell type-specific regulatory elements 97%
- Cohesin-mediated loop anchors confine the location of human replication origins 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Dissection of Sequence Features Affecting the Binding Specificity of a Pioneer Factor Reveals Binding Synergy Between FOXA1 and AP-1 97%
- Putative Looping Factor ZNF143/ZFP143 is an Essential Transcriptional Regulator with No Looping Function 97%
- Chromatin-dependent motif syntax defines differentiation trajectories 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.