STExplorer: Navigating the Micro-Geography of Spatial Omics Data
Zormpas, E.; Vlachogiannis, N. I.; Resteu, A.; Unsworth, A.; Tual-Chalot, S.; Dorgau, B.; Queen, R.; Lako, M.; Tiniakos, D.; Comber, A.; Anstee, Q. M.; Giakountis, A.; Cockell, S. J.
Show abstract
Spatial transcriptomics (ST) has the potential to provide unprecedented insights into gene expression across tissue architecture, but existing analytical methods often overlook the full complexity of the spatial dimension. We present STExplorer, an R package that adapts well-established computational geography (CG) methods to explore the micro-geography of spatial omics data. By incorporating techniques like Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis (GWPCA), Fuzzy Geographically Weighted Clustering (FGWC), Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), and analyses of observation Spatial Autocorrelation (SA), STExplorer enables the uncovering of spatially resolved patterns that capture the spatial heterogeneity of biological data. STExplorer provides a complete suite of functions for spatial analyses and visualisations, supporting deeper biological understanding and inference. Built on the Bioconductor ecosystem, the package integrates with SpatialFeatureExperiment objects, ensuring compatibility with existing pipelines. It includes preprocessing capabilities such as data import, quality control, gene count normalisation, and variable gene selection, alongside tools for downstream analysis and detailed visualisations that quantify and map spatial heterogeneity and relationships. We demonstrate the utility of STExplorer through applications to spatial transcriptomics datasets, revealing that spatially varying gene expression and relationships are often masked by standard analyses. By bridging bioinformatics and CG, STExplorer provides a novel and informed approach to spatial transcriptomics analysis, with robust tools to address spatial heterogeneity and its associated underlying biology, thereby advancing our understanding of complex tissue biology without reinventing the wheel.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- treeclimbR pinpoints the data-dependent resolution of hierarchical hypotheses 94%
- Neighborhood nonnegative matrix factorization identifies patterns and spatially-variable genes in large-scale spatial transcriptomics data 94%
- Explainable multi-view framework for dissecting inter-cellular signaling from highly multiplexed spatial data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MorphLink: Bridging Cell Morphological Behaviors and Molecular Dynamics in Multi-modal Spatial Omics 95%
- STANCE: a unified statistical model to detect cell-type-specific spatially variable genes in spatial transcriptomics 95%
- Spatial Transcriptomics to define transcriptional patterns of zonation and structural components in the liver 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Spatial PCA (RASP): a computationally efficient method for dimensionality reduction of high-resolution spatial transcriptomics data 95%
- Building, Benchmarking, and Exploring Perturbative Maps of Transcriptional and Morphological Data 94%
- Epiclomal: probabilistic clustering of sparse single-cell DNA methylation data 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.