Back

Physical therapists' perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in a post-pandemic world

McLaughlin, K. H.; Minick, K.; Fritz, J. M.; Tannahill, N.; Spar, A.; Feinsilver, M.; Weber, M.; Opoku, E.; Adams, J.; Skolasky, R. L.

2025-01-18 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.01.17.25320739 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo examine physical therapists experience providing telerehabilitation and their perceptions of telerehabilitation for patients with musculoskeletal conditions. MethodsSurvey of members of the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy ResultsWe received 208 completed responses to our survey invitation. Most physical therapists responding to our survey reported using little to no telerehabilitation prior to the pandemic but increased use during the pandemic, followed by decreased use of telerehabilitation after the pandemic. Respondents reported using telerehabilitation slightly more after the pandemic than beforehand. Physical therapists reported that they believed they could deliver effective care using telerehabilitation but that it was not as effective as in-clinic care and they would prefer to use telerehabilitation as part of a hybrid care model versus using only telerehabilitation. Physical therapists suggested that certain patients were more likely than others to benefit from telerehabilitation and identified specific factors (e.g., patient preference, self-efficacy, postoperative status) that influenced whom they would consider to be most appropriate for telerehabilitation. "Patient issues with technology" was identified as the most common barrier to telerehabilitation use. Most physical therapists reported that they planned to use telerehabilitation in the future and agreed that telerehabilitation plays an important role in expanding access to physical therapy in the United States. ConclusionsPhysical therapists believed that telerehabilitation continues to play an important role in a post-pandemic world. Although physical therapists reported that they considered telerehabilitation to be an effective method for delivering care, they did not consider it to be a replacement for in-clinic care and believed that certain patients are more likely than others to benefit from this approach. Impact StatementPhysical therapists consider telerehabilitation to be a viable care option for patients with musculoskeletal pain.

Published in Telemedicine and e-Health · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.