Electronic Health Record-Based Prediction Models to Inform Decisions about HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review
Agovi, A. M.-A.; Thompson, C. T.; Meadows, R. J.; Lu, Y.; Ojha, R. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundSeveral clinical prediction models have been developed using electronic health records data to help inform decisions about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescribing, but the characteristics and quality of these models have not been systematically assessed. We identified and critically appraised the characteristics and quality of studies reporting the development of electronic health records (EHR)-based models predicting HIV risk to inform decisions about PrEP prescribing. MethodsWe searched PubMed and the CINAHL databases between January 1, 2013 and June 19, 2023, with keywords related to EHR, HIV, and clinical prediction. We extracted data using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist and assessed risk of bias using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) short form. We used narrative synthesis to describe characteristics and quality of eligible models. ResultsWe identified 324 studies, of which 7 studies (resulting in 7 models) were eligible for our review. Several studies inadequately reported key components of the corresponding model. Most models were developed in the United States and used machine learning methods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was reported for six models, which ranged between 0.77 and 0.89. All models had high risk of bias, primarily because of low events per variable and risk of overfitting. ConclusionsWe observed inadequate reporting of key components and high risk of bias across all EHR-based models. Future studies would benefit from following standard reporting guidelines and best practices for developing prediction models, which may strengthen the validity and applicability of EHR-based prediction models for informing decisions about HIV PrEP prescribing. Trial registrationThe review protocol was registered and published in PROSPERO (CRD42023428057)
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between virtual visits and health outcomes of people living with HIV: A cross-sectional study 95%
- Measures of retention in HIV care: A protocol for a mixed methods study 95%
- Effectiveness of integrating cervical cancer prevention strategies into HIV care programmes: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Network Strategies to Distribute HIV Self-testing Kits: A Global Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis 95%
- Missed opportunities for HIV testing among those who accessed sexually transmitted infection (STI) services, tested for STIs and diagnosed with STIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Retention and Disengagement After Initiation on Antiretroviral Therapy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries After the Introduction of Universal Test and Treat Policies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 94%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 92%
- Implementation of Unassisted and Community-Based HIV Self-Testing (HIVST) during the COVID-19 pandemic among Men-who-have-sex-with-Men (MSM) and Transgender Women (TGW): A Demonstration Study in Metro Manila, Philippines 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Behaviourally-informed two-way text messaging to improve return to HIV care in South Africa: evidence from a randomised controlled trial 93%
- HIV service interruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: the role of HIV service challenges and institutional response from healthcare professional’s perspective 93%
- Does engagement in HIV care affect screening, diagnosis, and control of noncommunicable diseases in sub-Saharan Africa? A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.