Back

Electronic Health Record-Based Prediction Models to Inform Decisions about HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review

Agovi, A. M.-A.; Thompson, C. T.; Meadows, R. J.; Lu, Y.; Ojha, R. P.

2025-01-17 hiv aids
10.1101/2025.01.17.25320732 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSeveral clinical prediction models have been developed using electronic health records data to help inform decisions about HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescribing, but the characteristics and quality of these models have not been systematically assessed. We identified and critically appraised the characteristics and quality of studies reporting the development of electronic health records (EHR)-based models predicting HIV risk to inform decisions about PrEP prescribing. MethodsWe searched PubMed and the CINAHL databases between January 1, 2013 and June 19, 2023, with keywords related to EHR, HIV, and clinical prediction. We extracted data using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist and assessed risk of bias using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) short form. We used narrative synthesis to describe characteristics and quality of eligible models. ResultsWe identified 324 studies, of which 7 studies (resulting in 7 models) were eligible for our review. Several studies inadequately reported key components of the corresponding model. Most models were developed in the United States and used machine learning methods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was reported for six models, which ranged between 0.77 and 0.89. All models had high risk of bias, primarily because of low events per variable and risk of overfitting. ConclusionsWe observed inadequate reporting of key components and high risk of bias across all EHR-based models. Future studies would benefit from following standard reporting guidelines and best practices for developing prediction models, which may strengthen the validity and applicability of EHR-based prediction models for informing decisions about HIV PrEP prescribing. Trial registrationThe review protocol was registered and published in PROSPERO (CRD42023428057)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.5%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
5
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
7
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
9
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%