Back

Delineation and monitoring of the T cell repertoire of adoptive cell transfer product during the treatment of advanced melanoma

Kerr, C.; Soleimani, S.; Mulder, D. T.; Nabbi, A.; Gray, D.; Pedersen, S.; Sotov, V.; Sudhaman, S.; Nguyen, L.; Hirano, N.; Ohashi, P. S.; Butler, M.; Pugh, T. J.

2025-01-18 oncology
10.1101/2025.01.17.24311574 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAdoptive cell transfer (ACT) of Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is an investigational treatment for solid tumours, with preliminary results showing objective clinical responses in some metastatic melanoma patients. The ability to sequence and track the T cell repertoire throughout ACT of TILs provides a method to identify T cell repertoire features associated with patients benefit from ACT. Identification of response biomarkers for patients receiving ACT of TILs has been limited. Conflicting evidence is observed in biomarkers such as the number of TILs in the infusion product, with some studies suggesting a relationship with response and others not. Meanwhile, certain potential biomarkers, such as the diversity of the post- infusion peripheral repertoire, have not yet been studied. MethodsIn this study, we sought to determine 1) the efficacy of using CapTCR-seq to track TILs in serial blood draws over the course of ACT immunotherapy 2) whether peripheral T cell repertoire statistics are associated with ACT response. In this study, 9 patients with cutaneous (n = 7) or mucosal (n = 2) melanoma received TIL ACT after chemotherapeutic depletion. Hybrid- capture CapTCR-seq was conducted on pre-/post-transfer peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and cell-free DNA. ResultsComparison between PBMC DNA, PBMC RNA, and circulating free DNA (cfDNA) repertoires demonstrated an increased presence of shared T cell clonotypes post-infusion when compared with baseline samples. Higher abundance of TIL clonotypes in the PBMC baseline and post-infusion DNA T cell repertoires and the presence of shared DNA T cell clonotypes between timepoints was seen in responders when compared with non-responders according to RECIST criteria. ConclusionThese results demonstrate effective tracking methodologies and suggest a predictive role for baseline repertoire statistics in response to the ACT of TILs. Trial registrationUniversity Health Network Research Ethics Board #11-0683

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
3
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
7
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
12
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
19
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
20
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
24
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
25
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
26
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
27
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
28
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
29
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%