Back

Compromised 2-start zigzag chromatin folding in immature mouse retina cells driven by irregularly spaced nucleosomes with short DNA linkers.

Kable, B.; Portillo-Ledesma, S.; Popova, E. Y.; Jentink, N.; Swulius, M. T.; Li, Z.; Schlick, T.; Grigoryev, S.

2025-01-16 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.01.16.633430 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The formation of condensed heterochromatin is critical for establishing cell-specific transcriptional programs. To reveal structural transitions underlying heterochromatin formation in maturing mouse rod photoreceptors, we apply cryo-EM tomography, AI-assisted deep denoising, and molecular modeling. We find that chromatin isolated from immature retina cells contains many closely apposed nucleosomes with extremely short or absent nucleosome linkers, which are inconsistent with the typical two-start zigzag chromatin folding. In mature retina cells, the fraction of short-linker nucleosomes is much lower, supporting stronger chromatin compaction. By Cryo-EM-assisted nucleosome interaction capture we observe that chromatin in immature retina is enriched with i{+/-}1 interactions while chromatin in mature retina contains predominantly i{+/-}2 interactions typical of the two-start zigzag. By mesoscale modeling and computational simulation, we clarify that the unusually short linkers typical of immature retina are sufficient to inhibit the two-start zigzag and chromatin compaction by the interference of very short linkers with linker DNA stems. We propose that this short linker composition renders nucleosome arrays more open in immature retina and that, as the linker DNA length increases in mature retina, chromatin fibers become globally condensed via tight zigzag folding. This mechanism may be broadly utilized to introduce higher chromatin folding entropy for epigenomic plasticity.

Published in Nucleic Acids Research (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.