The impact of physician handoffs on the outcomes of admitted emergency department patients: a medical administrative database retrospective cohort study
Mokhtari, A.; Simonyan, D.; Mallet, M.; Blais, S.; Moore, L.; Berthelot, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionA physician handoff is the process through which physicians transfer the primary responsibility of a care unit. The emergency department (ED) is a fast-paced and crowded environment where the risk of information loss between shifts is significant. Yet, the impact of handoffs between emergency physicians on patient outcomes remains understudied. We performed a retrospective cohort study in the ED to determine if handed-off patients, when compared to non-handed-off patients, were at higher risk of negative outcomes. MethodsWe included every adult patient first assessed by an emergency physician and subsequently admitted to hospital in one of the five sites of the CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval during fiscal year 2016-17. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were incidence of ICU admission and surgery and hospital length of stay. We conducted propensity score based analysis accounting for patient and hospital clusters and adjusting for demographics, multiple disease severity indicators and ED processes indicators, including crowding. Results21,136 ED visits and 17,150 unique individuals were included in the study. Median[Q1-Q3] age, Charlson score, door-to-emergency-physician time and ED length of stay were 71[55-83] years old, 3[1-4], 48 [24,90] minutes, 20.8[9.9,32.7] hours, respectively. In propensity score analysis (OR handoff/no handoff [CI95%] or GMR[Cl95%]), handoff status was not associated with mortality (1.08[0.93,1.26]), ICU admission (1.01[0.87,1.18]) or hospital length of stay (1.02[0.94-1.10]). Sensitivity and sub-group based analyses yielded no further information. ConclusionEmergency physicians handoffs were not associated with an increase in risk of severe in-hospital adverse events. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of ED handoffs on adverse events of low and moderate severity. What is already known on this subjectHandoffs are widely believed to affect patient outcomes in the ED, although data remains scarce. What did this study askWhat is the impact of handoffs between emergency physicians on patient outcomes What this study addsHanded off patients do not seem to do worse than non handed off patients concerning majors outcomes (mortality, ICU admission, LOS). Why does it matter to clinicians?In the ED, handoffs may not represent a risk to patient outcomes. QI efforts may be better invested in other care inefficiencies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 96%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- A comparison of self-triage tools to nurse driven triage in the emergency department 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 96%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 94%
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishing consensus on emergency department interventions that could be conducted in sub-acute care settings for non-emergent paramedic transported visits: A RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study 96%
- Derivation And Validation Of A Clinical Score To Predict Death Among Non-Palliative COVID-19 Patients Presenting To Emergency Departments: The Ccedrrn COVID Mortality Score 96%
- Analyzing Supply and Demand on a General Internal Medicine Ward: A Cross-Sectional Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 95%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study 95%
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 92%
- An Observational Study of COVID-19 from A Large Healthcare System in Northern New Jersey: Diagnosis, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.