A CTC Model Uncovers Metastatic Drivers and Prognostic Markers in Breast Cancer
Fernandez-Santiago, C.; Martinez-Pena, I.; Parames, M.; Rodriguez, M.; Hurtado, P.; Abuin, C.; Costa, C.; Davila Ibanez, A. B.; Lopez-Lopez, R.; Pineiro, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) and CTC-clusters are pivotal in the metastatic process of breast cancer (BC). Owing to their low frequency, models replicating their biology should provide a robust platform for investigating the molecular mechanisms driving metastasis and identifying new biomarkers. We established and characterized a CTC-derived cell model from a mouse xenograft to explore its metastatic behavior and molecular profile, which allowed us to investigate the expression and prognostic significance of a set of genes associated with the metastatic potential of CTCs. MethodsThe CTC line (mCTC) derived from a MDA-MB-231 mouse xenografts was used in comparative functional analyses including cell cycle evaluation, colony formation, invasion, adhesion, and metastatic competency in zebrafish models. Transcriptomic profiling and functional assays were conducted to identify candidate genes and understand their roles in metastasis. Moreover, publicly available gene expression datasets of CTCs, CTC-clusters, and tumor tissue, from GEO and TCGA, were analyzed for the identification of a gene signature that was correlated with survival data. The signature was validated in an independent cohort. ResultsCompared with MDA-MB-231 cells, mCTC cells presented enhanced colony formation, invasion, and adhesion, and increased dissemination and survival in zebrafish. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that SPARC was significantly upregulated. Functional assays showed that SPARC overexpression was correlated with increased invasion and migration. Analysis of public datasets confirmed the high expression of SPARC in BC CTCs and CTC-clusters. Additionally, a 4-gene signature involving SPARC, THBS1, VCL, and HSP90AB1 was identified that demonstrated strong prognostic value, predicting shorter overall and distant metastasis-free survival in the primary tumor setting. Validation cohorts confirmed its ability to distinguish high-risk patients. Elevated expression of the 4-gene signature in CTCs was also indicative of increased mortality risk. ConclusionmCTC exhibit distinct metastatic traits and molecular characteristics, highlighting a possible role of SPARC in CTC biology and its potential as a prognostic marker in BC metastasis. The identified 4-gene signature provides a robust prognostic tool for assessing patient risk and guiding therapeutic strategies. Further investigations into the mechanistic role of SPARC may reveal new therapeutic targets for managing BC progression.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- FSTL3 is a biomarker of poor prognosis and is associated with immunotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer. 96%
- Unveiling the role of osteosarcoma-derived secretome in premetastatic lung remodeling 95%
- Blood-based detection of MMP11 as a marker of prostate cancer progression regulated by the ALDH1A1-TGF-β1 signaling mechanism 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ERK3/MAPK6 promotes triple-negative breast cancer progression through collective migration and EMT plasticity 96%
- Platinum chemotherapy induces lymphangiogenesis in cancerous and healthy tissues that can be prevented with adjuvant anti-VEGFR3 therapy 95%
- Integrated molecular and pharmacological characterization of patient-derived xenografts from bladder and ureteral cancers identifies new potential therapies. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A 'one-two punch' therapy strategy to target chemoresistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer 95%
- Oncometabolite lactate enhances breast cancer progression by orchestrating histone lactylation-dependent c-Myc expression 94%
- Clinical Significance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.