Back

The Paulinella chromatophore transit peptide part2 adopts a structural fold similar to the γ-glutamyl-cyclotransferase fold

Klimenko, V.; Reiners, J.; Applegate, V.; Reimann, K.; Hoeppner, A.; Smits, S. H. J.; Nowack, E. C. M.

2025-01-16 microbiology
10.1101/2025.01.15.633182 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The chromatophores of the cercozoan amoeba Paulinella are photosynthetic organelles that evolved from a cyanobacterial endosymbiont. Many nucleus-encoded chromatophore-targeted proteins carry unusual N-terminal targeting signals termed crTPs. The crTPs are bipartite. Whereas crTPpart1 that likely mediates trafficking through the secretory pathway is cleaved off during import, crTPpart2 remains attached to its cargo protein. The function of crTPpart2 is unknown. To contribute to unravel the functional role of crTPpart2, here we elucidated the structures of crTPpart2 from two different chromatophore-targeted proteins by X-ray crystallography at [~]2.3 [A] resolution. Interestingly, the crTPpart2 of both proteins adopts a structural fold. Both structures share a conserved structured core and a flexible N-terminal arm. The structured core resembles proteins of the {gamma}-glutamyl cyclotransferase superfamily within which crTPpart2 structures form a novel protein (sub)-family. The proposed catalytic center typical for proteins with cyclotransferase activity is not conserved in crTPpart2. A Cys pair that is conserved in crTPpart2 of many chromatophore-targeted proteins has been captured as disulfide bridge. Together, our data suggests that chromatophore-targeted proteins are imported in their folded state and that the fold adopted by crTPpart2 plays a functional role during import. The characterization of its structure and flexibility provides important steps towards elucidating this novel protein translocation mechanism.

Published in Plant Physiology · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.