Back

Tumor suppressor genotype influences the extent and mode of immunosurveillance in lung cancer

Adler, K. M.; Xu, H.; Gladstein, A. C.; Irizarry-Negron, V. M.; Robertson, M. R.; Doerig, K. R.; Petrov, D. A.; Winslow, M. M.; Feldser, D. M.

2025-01-19 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.01.15.633175 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The impact of cancer driving mutations in regulating immunosurveillance throughout tumor development remains poorly understood. To better understand the contribution of tumor genotype to immunosurveillance, we generated and validated lentiviral vectors that create an epi-allelic series of increasingly immunogenic neoantigens. This vector system is compatible with autochthonous Cre-regulated cancer models, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic genome editing, and tumor barcoding. Here, we show that in the context of KRAS-driven lung cancer and strong neoantigen expression, tumor suppressor genotype dictates the degree of immune cell recruitment, positive selection of tumors with neoantigen silencing, and tumor outgrowth. By quantifying the impact of 11 commonly inactivated tumor suppressor genes on tumor growth across neoantigenic contexts, we show that the growth promoting effects of tumor suppressor gene inactivation correlate with increasing sensitivity to immunosurveillance. Importantly, specific genotypes dramatically increase or decrease sensitivity to immunosurveillance independently of their growth promoting effects. We propose a model of immunoediting in which tumor suppressor gene inactivation works in tandem with neoantigen expression to shape tumor immunosurveillance and immunoediting such that the same neoantigens uniquely modulate tumor immunoediting depending on the genetic context. One Sentence SummaryHere we uncover an under-appreciated role for tumor suppressor gene inactivation in shaping immunoediting upon neoantigen expression.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.