Back

Built-environment professionals welcome prescriptive ecology evidence to enhance communication with stakeholders for biodiversity-inclusive cities: Insights from professionals in both the Global North and South

Lu, J.; Li, L.; Hernando, A.; Manzanera, J. A.

2025-01-17 ecology
10.1101/2025.01.15.633110 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cities play a crucial role in addressing the biodiversity crisis. Despite advancements in urban ecology, effectively integrating biodiversity into urban planning remains limited. Built-environment professionals (BEPs), who are responsible for local actions, often face criticism for their unwillingness to prioritize biodiversity and are seldom studied from their perspectives, especially those from the Global South. Therefore, understanding the viewpoints of diverse BEPs from both the Global South and North on biodiversity-inclusive urban planning and design (BIPD) is crucial. This study employs Q-Methodology to analyze BEPs perspectives in Ethiopia, China, Spain, and the United States, revealing four viewpoints: Pluralist, Enthusiast, Pragmatist, and Contextualist. Challenges in realizing BIPD include widespread unawareness among BEPs of existing biodiversity data and methodologies, structural-physical barriers such as land use conflicts and competing resources, and misaligned values with stakeholders. Our research challenges the notion that BEPs resist incorporating biodiversity into their practices by broadly exploring their viewpoints. BEPs exhibit readiness to transcend legislative structural barriers and leverage professional norms to advocate for urban biodiversity, particularly when equipped with evidence-based tools. Pluralists and Enthusiasts demonstrate heightened interest in multidisciplinary collaboration and prescriptive, visual tools to communicate biodiversitys value to stakeholders. Critically, BEPs capacity to act hinges on the availability of contextually sensitive methods, necessitating empowerment through transdisciplinary collaborations to foster transformative changes in cities, especially in the Global South, where complex socioeconomic-ecological trade-offs demand co-produced solutions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
4
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
9
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
13
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
15
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
16
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
23
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.2%
25
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
26
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%