A Simple, Low-Cost, and Efficient Protocol for Rapid Isolation of Pathogenic Bacteria from Human Blood
Coskun, F. S.; Quick, J.; Toprak, E.
Show abstract
Bacteremia is a serious clinical condition in which pathogenic bacteria enter the bloodstream, putting patients at risk of septic shock and necessitating antibiotic treatment. Choosing the most effective antibiotic is crucial not only for resolving the infection but also for minimizing side effects, such as dysbiosis in the healthy microbiome and reducing the selection pressure for antibiotic resistance. This requires prompt identification of the pathogen and antibiotic susceptibility testing, yet these processes are inherently slow in standard clinical microbiology labs due to reliance on growth-based assays. Although alternative methods exist, they are rarely adopted in clinical settings because they involve complex protocols and high costs for training and infrastructure. Here, we present an optimized, simple protocol for rapidly and efficiently isolating bacterial pathogens from blood without altering typical laboratory workflows. Our method is cost-effective and compatible with commonly available laboratory instruments, offering the advantage of isolating bacterial cells directly, which bypasses the delays associated with traditional blood culture methods and enables faster diagnostic results. The protocol achieved over 70% efficiency within 30 minutes, remained effective at low bacterial concentrations (1-10 bacteria/0.3 mL blood), and preserved bacterial viability with no notable change in growth lag times. We validated the protocol on several clinically relevant bacterial strains, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus. These findings highlight our protocols potential utility in clinical and research settings, facilitating timely cultures and minimizing diagnostic delays.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid nanopore metagenomic sequencing and predictive susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures from intensive care patients with sepsis 94%
- A simple solid media assay for detection of synergy between bacteriophages and antibiotics 94%
- Analytical Assessment of Metagenomic Workflows for Pathogen Detection with NIST RM 8376 and Two Sample Matrices 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections 94%
- resaCPE: A Rapid, Low-Cost Colourimetric Assay for the Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales 93%
- A hemagglutination-based, semi-quantitative test for point-of-care determination of SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of Klebsiella Intestinal Colonization Density to Assess Infection Risk 93%
- Tracking of antibiotic resistance transfer and rapid plasmid evolution in a hospital setting by Nanopore sequencing 92%
- Achromobacter xylosoxidans isolates exhibit genome diversity, variable virulence, high levels of antibiotic resistance and potential intrahost evolution. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient DNA cross-reactivity of the CDC SARS-CoV-2 extraction control leads to an inherent potential for false negative results 92%
- Applications of Digital Microscopy and Densely Connected Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Quantitation of Babesia-Infected Erythrocytes 91%
- Clinical application of ISO and CEN/TS standards for liquid biopsies - information everybody wants but nobody wants to pay for 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed PCR to measure in situ growth rates of uropathogenic E. coli during experimental urinary tract infection. 93%
- SimUrine: A Novel, Fully Defined Artificial Urinary Media for Enhanced Microbiological Research of Urinary Bacteria 92%
- A flexible and efficient microfluidics platform for the characterization and isolation of novel bacteriophages 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.