Back

New insights into the cis-regulation of the CFTR gene in pancreatic cells

Blotas, C.; Le Nabec, A.; Collobert, M.; Bulcaen, M.; Carlon, M.; Ferec, C.; Moisan, S.

2025-01-19 genomics
10.1101/2025.01.14.632890 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSpatial organization of the genome is fundamental for ensuring accurate gene expression. This process depends on the communication between gene promoters and distal cis-regulatory elements (CREs), which together make up 8% of the human genome and are supported by the chromatin structure. It is estimated that over 90% of disease-associated variants are located in the non-coding region of the genome and may affect CRE. For the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, a complete understanding of tissue-specific CFTR expression and regulation is missing, in particular in the pancreas. Mechanistic insights into tissue-specific expression may provide clarity on the clinical heterogeneity observed in Cystic Fibrosis and CFTR-related disorders. MethodsTo understand the role of 3D chromatin architecture in establishing tissue-specific expression of the CFTR gene, we mapped chromatin interactions via circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) and epigenomic regulation through H3K27ac and DNase Hypersensitive site I (DHS) in Capan-1 pancreatic cells. Candidate regulatory regions are validated by luciferase reporter assay and CRISPR-knock out. ResultsWe identified active regulatory regions not only around the CFTR gene but also outside the topologically associating domain (TAD). By performing functional assays, we validated our targets and revealed a cooperative effect of the -44 kb, -35 kb, +15.6 kb and 37.7 kb regions, which share common predicted transcription factor (TF) motifs. Comparative 3D genomic analysis and functional assays using the Caco-2 intestinal cell line revealed the presence of tissue-specific CREs. ConclusionBy studying the chromatin architecture of the CFTR locus in Capan-1 cells, we demonstrated the involvement of multiple CREs upstream and downstream of the CFTR gene. We also extend our analysis to compare intestinal and pancreatic cells and provide information on the tissue-specificity of CRE. These findings highlight the importance of expanding the search for causative variants beyond the gene coding sequence but also by considering the tissue-specific 3D genome.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
6
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
9
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
BMC Genomic Data
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Epigenomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
20
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%