Deciphering Features of Metalloprotease Cleavage Targets Using Protein Structure Prediction
Chung, D. S.; Park, J.; Choi, W.; Seong, D. Y.; Hong, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionADAM10 (A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 10) cleaves specific substrates, influencing diverse physiological and pathological processes. However, its substrate specificity and cleavage sites remain insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to identify and classify substrate features and elucidate cleavage sites using computational approaches. MethodsProtein structure prediction was performed on 13 substrates with experimentally defined cleavage sites to analyze ADAM10-substrate interactions and assess their structural and spatial characteristics. ResultsBased on protein structure prediction of experimentally validated substrates, we identified four recurrent structural features associated with ADAM10-mediated cleavage. First, most substrates were predicted to interact with the proteolytically active form of ADAM10 (92.3%). Second, interaction sites were typically located in the extracellular region rather than intracellular or transmembrane domains (76.9%). Third, cleavage sites predominantly resided in unstructured or extended loop regions, corresponding to linear secondary structures ([~]70%). Lastly, cleavage sites were spatially enriched in octants (1, 4, 5, and 8) relative to the catalytic Zn{superscript 2}{square} ion in the active site (84.0%). These percentages were calculated per determinant. On the basis of these determinants, we developed a classification algorithm and organized 51 substrates accordingly. As a result, 82.4% of the substrates were assigned to either Group 1 (51.0%) or Group 2 (31.4%). DiscussionThis study presents a structure-informed classification approach for predicting ADAM10 cleavage substrates, enabling candidate identification without direct experimental validation. ConclusionsWe present a novel structure-based framework for classifying the substrates of ADAM10 and demonstrate its applicability to other Metalloproteases.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Combinatorial Strategy for HRV 3C Protease Engineering to Achieve the N-terminal Free Cleavage 95%
- A computational study of the fold and stability of cytochrome c with implications for disease 94%
- Computational insights into mechanism of AIM4-mediated inhibition of aggregation of TDP-43 protein implicated in ALS and evidence for in vitro inhibition of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of TDP-432C-A315T by AIM4. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design of multi-epitope vaccine candidate against Brucella type IV secretion system (T4SS) 94%
- Conserved intramolecular networks in GDAP1 are closely connected to CMT-linked mutations and protein stability 94%
- Analysis of AlphaFold and molecular dynamics structure predictions of mutations in serpins 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rational Design of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoproteins To Increase Immunogenicity By T Cell Epitope Engineering 94%
- Structural modelling of human complement FHR1 and two of its synthetic derivatives provides insight into their in-vivo functions 94%
- Role of Dengue in SARS-CoV-2 Evolution in Dengue Endemic Regions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel Peptide Inhibitor of Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-α has Antiarthritic Activity 94%
- Predicting human and viral protein variants affecting COVID-19 susceptibility and repurposing therapeutics 94%
- Computational Insights into the Allosteric Behavior of Mini Proinsulin Driven by C Peptide Mobility 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Binding of different substrate molecules at the docking site and the active site of γ-secretase can trigger toxic events in sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease 94%
- Comprehensive collection and prediction of ABC transmembrane protein structures in the AI era of structural biology 93%
- Structural characterization of covalently stabilized human cystatin C oligomers 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.