A simple demonstration of a privacy-preserving de-centralised genotype imputation workflow
Letaillandier, A.; Picard-Druet, D.; Ludwig, T. E.; Marenne, G.; Herzig, A. F.
Show abstract
Recently, a number of studies have looked at the problem of privacy and data-sharing restrictions in the context of missing genotype imputation servers. This relates to the most typical imputation pipelines which involve a whole-genome sequenced haplotype reference panel being compared to genotyped study individuals (who have missing data to be imputed). Hence, involving two datasets from separate sources coming together in one informatic environment, where relatively complicated statistical models are applied; specifically, hidden Markov modelling. We give a short review of the current literature in this domain, observing three prevalent strategies: complicated data encryption, technical solutions to secure computation environments, and rearrangements of haplotype data in an effort to provide anonymisation. We embarked on a thought experiment to provide a potential fourth type of solution involving federating the different internal tasks within the statistical methods used for imputation. This idea is relevant considering there is currently motivation for federated analyses platforms in Europe for making combined inference across multiple genomic data resources. This allows for very simple manipulations to protect sensitive individual level data, which enable imputation algorithms to complete on simple plain-text files. We provide here an illustration of how such a federated imputation server could be put in place, along with associated code, including a simple implementation of the Li-Stephens haplotype mosaic model to achieve the imputation of missing genotypes. We name our general framework ANONYMP for anonymised imputation. A demonstration of the concept is given involving simulated data generated with msprime. We show that dividing different parts of the required calculations for statistical imputation between several sites is a valuable new avenue in the field of privacy-preserving imputation server development.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo genotyping algorithm on PROVEDIt mixtures including a novel precision benchmark 94%
- Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with strict convergence criteria reduces run-to-run variability in forensic DNA mixture deconvolution 94%
- Enhanced SNP Genotyping with Symmetric Multinomial Logistic Regression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- FedGMMAT: Federated Generalized Linear Mixed Model Association Tests 93%
- Biological networks and GWAS: comparing and combining network methods to understand the genetics of familial breast cancer susceptibility in the GENESIS study 93%
- Learning massive interpretable gene regulatory networks of the human brain by merging Bayesian Networks 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.