Back

Computational modeling of the temporal influences between cues, craving and use in addiction: A dynamical system analysis based on ecological momentary assessment

Gauld, C.; Depannemaecker, D.; Serre, F.; Auriacombe, M.

2025-01-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.01.13.25320446 medRxiv
Show abstract

Substance Use Disorders (SUD) can be conceptualized as a prospective link from cues to craving and use. To explore the nonlinear relationships between craving and cues, this study applied dynamical systems theory (DST) to ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data. Optimized linear Seasonal Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous variable (SARIMAX) models were used to phenotype patients with SUD (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, opiates, and cocaine), considering the potential for complex interactions between cue exposure and craving intensity in daily life. These phenotypic profiles were replicated in computational DST models to analyze the nonlinear interactions between cues, craving, and use. The study involved 211 individuals and 8,260 observations, with 154 patients fitting the SARIMAX model for the influence of cues on craving, and 57 patients fitting the SARIMAX model for a possible influence of craving on cues. Two DST models were adjusted to replicate the complex temporal dynamics of SUD based on these two directions of influence. The first DST model (adjusted to the influence of cues on craving) showed that an increase in cues leads to a rise in craving, which then diminishes both cues and craving itself, with use patterns following cravings trajectory. This patient profile is driven by a phenomenon of "maximum cue saturation". The second DST model (adjusted to the influence of craving on cues) demonstrated that an increase in craving was followed by an increase in cue reporting, leading to use, with use peaking and then reducing craving. This patient profile is characterized by a phenomenon of "maximum use saturation". Both models highlight craving as an essential modulator between cues and use, opening new therapeutic avenues.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.7%
2
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.0%
4
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.5%
6
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
11
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Addiction Biology
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Schizophrenia
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%