Back

Computational modeling of the temporal influences between cues, craving and use in addiction: A dynamical system analysis based on ecological momentary assessment

Gauld, C.; Depannemaecker, D.; Serre, F.; Auriacombe, M.

2025-01-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.01.13.25320446 medRxiv
Show abstract

Substance Use Disorders (SUD) can be conceptualized as a prospective link from cues to craving and use. To explore the nonlinear relationships between craving and cues, this study applied dynamical systems theory (DST) to ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data. Optimized linear Seasonal Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous variable (SARIMAX) models were used to phenotype patients with SUD (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, opiates, and cocaine), considering the potential for complex interactions between cue exposure and craving intensity in daily life. These phenotypic profiles were replicated in computational DST models to analyze the nonlinear interactions between cues, craving, and use. The study involved 211 individuals and 8,260 observations, with 154 patients fitting the SARIMAX model for the influence of cues on craving, and 57 patients fitting the SARIMAX model for a possible influence of craving on cues. Two DST models were adjusted to replicate the complex temporal dynamics of SUD based on these two directions of influence. The first DST model (adjusted to the influence of cues on craving) showed that an increase in cues leads to a rise in craving, which then diminishes both cues and craving itself, with use patterns following cravings trajectory. This patient profile is driven by a phenomenon of "maximum cue saturation". The second DST model (adjusted to the influence of craving on cues) demonstrated that an increase in craving was followed by an increase in cue reporting, leading to use, with use peaking and then reducing craving. This patient profile is characterized by a phenomenon of "maximum use saturation". Both models highlight craving as an essential modulator between cues and use, opening new therapeutic avenues.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.3%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
5
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
18
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%