COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and its Determinants in Cameroon: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Cheuyem, F. Z. L.; Amani, A.; Achangwa, C.; Ajong, B. N.; Minkandi, C. A.; Zeh, M. M. M. K.; Ntsek, L. L. E.; Essomba, J. P.; Jiogue, R. C.; Ndagijimana, O.; Nchanji, N. E.; Danwang, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination is crucial for mitigating the pandemics impact. However, vaccine hesitancy and access challenges have hindered global vaccination efforts. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled COVID-19 vaccine uptake proportion and identify associated determinants in Cameroon. MethodsThis review, conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, identified articles through searches of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, as well as through gray literature. The search encompassed published and unpublished studies from 2021 to 2024 reporting on COVID-19 vaccine uptake and/or acceptance in Cameroon. Extracted data were compiled in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using R statistical software (version 4.4.2). A random-effects model was employed when heterogeneity exceeded 50%. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots, Eggers test, and Beggs test. Meta-regression was used to explore the influence of study characteristics. ResultsTwenty-two studies, encompassing 24,130 participants, were included. The pooled vaccine uptake proportion was 37.14% (95% CI: 29.24-45.05), with substantial heterogeneity (I{superscript 2} = 98.2%, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed lower uptake among the general population (23.18%; 95% CI: 10.11-36.25) and in community settings (16.0%; 95% CI: 0.97-31.04) compared with healthcare workers (42.12%; 95% CI: 34.14-50.09). Younger age (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.42-0.67) was inversely associated with vaccine uptake, while being in a partnership (OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.11-2.27) was positively associated. Higher levels of education (OR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.56-1.97), urban residence (OR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.21-2.29). ConclusionThis meta-analysis revealed a suboptimal pooled COVID-19 vaccine uptake required to ensure a herd immunity. The results of this meta-analysis underline the crucial need to step up efforts to improve vaccination coverage, particularly among the most vulnerable populations. Identifying and addressing the factors underlying this low coverage is imperative if public health objectives are to be met. Public health interventions should be tailored to address the specific concerns and needs of different age groups and marital statuses.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The connection between COVID-19 vaccine abundance, vaccination coverage, and public trust in government across the globe 96%
- Parental attitudes towards mandatory vaccination; a systematic review 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The burden of vaccine hesitancy for routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon: restrictive sampling technique 97%
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 97%
- Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptability Among Refugees and Other Migrant Populations: A Systematic Scoping Review 96%
- Acceptance and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.