Back

Identification and classification of abundant RNA-binding proteins in the mouse lens and interactions of Carhsp1, Igf2bp1/ZBP1, and Ybx1 with crystallin and β-actin mRNAs

Rayee, D.; Hwang, D.-W.; Chang, W. K.; Karp, I. N.; Zhao, Y.; Bowman, T. V.; Lachke, S.; Singer, R.; Eliscovich, C.; Cvekl, A.

2025-01-11 developmental biology
10.1101/2025.01.10.632466 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are critical regulators of mRNAs controlling all processes such as RNA transcription, transport, localization, translation, mRNA:ncRNA interactions, and decay. Cellular differentiation is driven by tissue-specific and/or tissue-preferred expression of proteins needed for the optimal function of mature cells, tissues and organs. Lens fiber cell differentiation is marked by high levels of expression of crystallin genes encoding critical proteins for lens transparency and light refraction. Herein we performed proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of RBPs in differentiating mouse lenses to identify the most abundant RBPs and establish dynamic changes of their expression in differentiating lens. Expression analyses include highly abundant RBPs, including Carhsp1, Igf2bp1/ZBP1, Ybx1, Pabpc1, Ddx39, and Rbm38. Binding sites of Carhsp1, Ybx1, and Igf2bp1/ZBP1 were predicted in various crystallin and {beta}-actin mRNAs. Immunoprecipitations using antibodies against Carhsp1, Igf2bp1/ZBP1, and Ybx1 confirmed their interactions with A-, B-, and {gamma}A-crystallin mRNAs. A combination of single molecule RNA FISH (smFISH) and immunofluorescence was used to probe in vivo interactions of these RBPs with A-, B-crystallin, and {beta}-actin mRNAs in cytoplasm and nucleoplasm of cultured mouse lens epithelial cells. Together, these results open new avenues to perform comprehensive genetic, cell, and molecular biology studies of individual RBPs in the lens.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.