Extending empirical dynamic modeling to cross-sectional data beyond traditional time series.
Deyle, E. R.; Pao, G.; Sugihara, G.
Show abstract
The foundation of Empirical dynamic modeling (EDM) is in representing time-series data as the trajectory of a dynamic system in a multidimensional state space rather than as a collection of traces of individual variables changing through time. Takenss theorem provides a rigorous basis for adopting this state-space view of time-series data even from just a single time series, but there is considerable additional value to building out a state space with explicit covariates. Multivariate EDM case studies to-date, however, generally rely on building up understanding first from univariate to multivariate and use lag-coordinate embeddings for critical steps along the path of analysis. Here, we propose an alternative set of steps for multivariate EDM analysis when the traditional roadmap is not practicable. The general approach borrows ideas of random data projection from compressed sensing, but additional justification is described within the framework of Takenss theorem. We then detail algorithms that implement this alternative method and validate through application to simulated model data. The model demonstrations are constructed to explicitly demonstrate the possibility for this approach to extend EDM application from time-series trajectories to effectively realizations of the underlying vector field, i.e. data sets that measure change over time with very short formal time series but are otherwise "big" in terms of number of variables and samples.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Maximum Entropy Principle For Compositional Data 94%
- Practical Identifiability in the Frame of Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models: the Example of the in vitro Erythropoiesis 94%
- Exact calculation of stationary solution and parameter sensitivity analysis of stochastic continuous time Boolean models 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.