Machine learning for estimating and comparing clinical rules for treating diarrheal illness with antibiotics
Codi, A. M.; Kim, S.; Rogawski McQuade, E. T.; Benkeser, D.; AntiBiotics for Children with severe Diarrhea (ABCD) Study Group,
Show abstract
Acute diarrheal disease is one of the leading causes of death in children under age 5, disproportionately impacting children in low-resource settings. Many of these cases are caused by bacteria and therefore could respond to antibiotic treatment; however, the benefits of widely prescribing antibiotics must be weighed against the risks for the emergence of microbial resistance. These challenges present the opportunity for developing individualized treatment guidelines for diarrheal disease. In this study, we utilize a framework for the creation and evaluation of individualized treatment rules that leverage diagnostic and other clinical information to recommend antibiotic treatment to children with watery diarrhea. In contrast to many applications of pipelines for creating and evaluating treatment rules, we (i) explicitly consider creating rules that limit the proportion of children treated under a rule, to limit risks for overtreatment and the emergence of microbial resistance and (ii) propose methods to compare the performance of rules based on different sets of input covariates, which allows for quantification of the impact of measuring additional diagnostic biomarkers in clinical settings. We use a nested cross validation procedure that makes use of ensemble machine learning and doubly-robust estimation approach to derive, evaluate, and compare rules. We demonstrate that our proposed method yields appropriate inference in a realistic simulation study and apply our method to a real-data analysis of the AntiBiotics for Children with severe Diarrhea (ABCD) trial.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity to missing not at random dropout in clinical trials: use and interpretation of the Trimmed Means Estimator 96%
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 95%
- Estimation of Vaccine Efficacy for Variants that Emerge After the Placebo Group Is Vaccinated 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incorporating data from multiple endpoints in the analysis of clinical trials: example from RSV vaccines 95%
- Incorporating efficacy data from initial trials into subsequent evaluations of vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus 94%
- Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis for Two-Stream Capture-Recapture Methods in Disease Surveillance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 95%
- Comparison of Bayesian networks, G-estimation and linear models to estimate causal treatment effects in aggregated N-of-1 trials 94%
- Prediction-powered Inference for Clinical Trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging infectious disease models to interpret randomized controlled trials: controlling enteric pathogen transmission through water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions 96%
- Estimation of introduction and transmission rates of SARS-CoV-2 in a prospective household study 93%
- Covasim: an agent-based model of COVID-19 dynamics and interventions 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.