Back

Profiling of early-onset bladder cancer identifies key genomic alterations and potential targets

Magnani, C. J.; D'Andrea, V. D.; Qian, Z.; Ernandez, J.; Yim, K.; Kibel, A. S.; Chang, S. L.; Mossanen, M.; Preston, M. A.; Feldman, A. S.; Bochner, B. H.; Solit, D. B.; Pietzak, E. J.; Mouw, K. W.; Carvalho, F. L. F.; Clinton, T. N.

2025-01-12 urology
10.1101/2025.01.10.25320337 medRxiv
Show abstract

Younger patients with bladder cancer typically have fewer environmental exposures or risk factors, suggesting molecular pathways implicated in early-onset disease differ from older patients. Dissecting the genomic profile of early-onset tumors may define targeted treatments for these young patients. We compared the frequency of somatic mutations in early-onset bladder cancer, defined as diagnosis before the age of 55 years old which encompasses about 1 in 10 diagnoses, in two cohorts: the Mass General Brigham Young Cystectomy Cohort (MGB-YCC, n=134 patients) and the Memorial Sloan-Kettering-IMPACT bladder cancer cohort (MSK-IMPACT, n=1271). Both MGB-YCC and MSK-IMPACT cohorts were predominantly male with younger patients less likely to smoke or have muscle-invasive disease. Genomic characterization in MGB-YCC demonstrated KMT2D mutations almost exclusively among the youngest patients (83% <45-years-old, p=0.008). MSK-IMPACT revealed a significant increase of FGFR3 mutations in younger patients (37% vs 23%, p<0.001). Altogether, our results find key somatic mutations likely drive early-onset bladder cancers, some of which may be targetable; this suggests potential benefit from genomic tumor profiling to guide personalized treatment. Source of FundingNCI K08CA282969-01A1 (FLC), BCAN Career Development Award (FLC), NCI 3P30CA006516-59W2 Early-Stage Surgeon-Scientist Program award (FLC). Disclosures or conflictsnone

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.