Loss of Effort in Chronic Low-Back Pain Patients: Motivational Anhedonia in Chronic Pain
Alldritt, S.; Jammoul, M.; Makary, M.; Becker, S.; Maeng, D.; Keane, B.; Zald, D.; Geha, P.
Show abstract
The motivational and affective properties of chronic pain significantly impact patients lives and response to treatment but remain poorly understood. Most available phenotyping tools of chronic pain affect rely on patients self-report. Here we instead directly studied the willingness of chronic low-back pain (CLBP) patients to expend effort to win monetary rewards available for wins at different probabilities and different levels of difficulties in comparison to matched pain free controls and obtained functional brain imaging on a sub-group of our sample to link behavior to brain properties. We aimed to specifically test for a differential relationship of the functional connectivity in reward and effort related brain networks, and measures of effort in patients and pain free controls. Consistent with the hypothesis of "negative hedonic shift" in chronic pain we observed that CLBP patients are significantly less willing than pain free controls to expend effort to go for high cost/high reward choices and their reported low-back pain intensity predicted increased effort discounting. Furthermore, patients task performance was directly correlated to functional connectivity between the ventral striatum and ventro-medial prefrontal cortex, which are major nodes in the reward processing network. Patients performance was not explained by their self-reported depressive symptoms. Our results present new behavioral evidence characterizing the nature of anhedonia in chronic pain and links it directly to cortico-striatal connectivity highlighting the role of this circuitry in the pathophysiology of chronic pain.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Augmented Pain-Evoked Primary Sensorimotor Cortex Activation in Adolescent Girls with Juvenile Fibromyalgia 96%
- Baseline Resting-State Functional Connectivity Determines Subsequent Pain Ratings to a Tonic Ecologically Valid Experimental Model of Orofacial Pain 95%
- Neural effects of placebo analgesia in fibromyalgia patients and healthy individuals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shared Neural Dysregulations Mediate Dysregulated Empathy for Pain across Mental Disorders – a Pre-registered Neuroimaging Meta - Analysis 93%
- Neurocognitive measures of self-blame and risk prediction models of recurrence in major depressive disorder 92%
- Hypoactivation of ventromedial frontal cortex in major depressive disorder: an MEG study of the Reward Positivity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low somatosensory cortex excitability in the acute stage of low back pain causes chronic pain 94%
- Effects of Savoring Meditation on Positive Emotions and Pain-Related Brain Function: A Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis 94%
- Is mindfulness associated with lower pain reactivity and connectivity of the default mode network? A replication and extension study in healthy and episodic migraine participants 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain white matter pathways of resilience to chronic back pain: a multisite validation 95%
- Cortico-spinal coupling along descending pain system differentiates between opioid and saline treatment in healthy participants 94%
- Simultaneous Brain, Brainstem and Spinal Cord pharmacological-fMRI reveals endogenous opioid network interactions mediating attentional analgesia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intrinsic Network Activity Reflects the Ongoing Experience of Chronic Pain 93%
- Functional connectivity of music-induced analgesia in fibromyalgia 92%
- Indoxyl sulfate, a gut microbiome-derived uremic toxin, is associated with psychic anxiety and its functional magnetic resonance imaging-based neurologic signature 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.