Interpreting Lung Cancer Health Disparity at Transcriptome Level
Sobhan, M.; Islam, M. M.; Mondal, A. M.
Show abstract
Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with disparities in incidence and outcomes observed across different racial and sex groups. Understanding the genetic factors of these disparities is critical for developing targeted treatment therapies. This study aims to identify both patient-specific and cohort-specific biomarker genes that contribute to lung cancer health disparities among African American males (AAMs), European American males (EAMs), African American females (AAFs), and European American females (EAFs). The real-world data is highly imbalanced with respect to race, and the lung cancer dataset is no exception. So, classification with race labels will generate highly biased results toward the larger cohort. We developed a computational framework by designing the classification problems with disease conditions instead of races and leveraging the local interpretability of explainable AI, SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). This study used three disease conditions of lung cancer, including Lung Adenocarcinoma (LUAD), Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (LUSC), and Healthy samples (HEALTHY) to design four classification tasks: one 3-class problem (LUAD-LUSC-HEALTHY) and three 2-class problems (LUAD-LUSC, LUAD-HEALTHY, and LUSC-HEALTHY). This multiple-classification approach allows a LUAD patient to be interrogated via three classification problems, namely LUAD-LUSC-HEALTHY, LUAD-LUSC, and LUAD-HEALTHY, thus providing a robust approach of retrieving disparity information for individual patients through the local interpretation of SHAP. The proposed method successfully discovered the sets of genes and pathways related to health disparities in lung cancer between two cohorts, including AAMs vs. EAMs, AAFs vs. EAFs, AAMs vs. AAFs, and EAMs vs. EAFs. The discovered list of genes and pathways provide a short list for biological scientists to conduct wet lab experiment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 95%
- Development of an absolute assignment predictor for triple-negative breast cancer subtyping using machine learning approaches 95%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 95%
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 95%
- A deep learning approach for Pan-Renal Cell Carcinoma classification and survival prediction from histopathology images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fertility-LightGBM: A fertility-related protein prediction model by multi-information fusion and light gradient boosting machine 94%
- Expression Analysis, Molecular Characterization and Prognostic Evaluation on TMED4 and TMED9 Gene Expression in Glioma 92%
- A Fully Automated Deep Learning-based Network For Detecting COVID-19 from a New And Large Lung CT Scan Dataset 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.