Guidestar: a spike-in approach to improve RNA detection accuracy in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics
Tan, J. X. M.; Wang, L.; Seow, W. Y.; Boonruangkan, J.; Huang, M.; Toh, J.; Chen, K. H.; Chou, N.
Show abstract
Imaging-based spatial transcriptomics technologies, such as MERFISH and seq-FISH, use combinatorial barcoding and imaging to simultaneously detect individual RNA molecules from 10s to 10,000s of genes. These technologies require the decoding of individual RNA molecules location and gene identity from stacks of images. However, beyond using blank code-words as negative controls, there is a lack of ground truth information embedded within the assay to experimentally measure the accuracy and sensitivity of the decoding algorithm. We introduce Guidestar, a system of spike-in controls integrated within a combinatorial FISH assay, that labels a subset of RNA transcripts with additional probes. These probes are imaged separately as guide bits, which serve as ground-truth data to assess decoding accuracy at the level of individual RNA molecules. Using Guidestar to evaluate accuracy of an existing decoding method suggested alternative parameter settings that increased sensitivity with minimal impact on accuracy. We also used the Guidestar dataset to train a machine-learning based classifier to distinguish true from false RNA calls, yielding 9% and 40% higher F1 scores across cell line and tissue samples, respectively.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Demultiplexing and barcode-specific adaptive sampling for nanopore direct RNA sequencing 96%
- CapTrap-Seq: A platform-agnostic and quantitative approach for high-fidelity full-length RNA transcript sequencing 96%
- Biochemical-free enrichment or depletion of RNA classes in real-time during direct RNA sequencing with RISER 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.