Noise Correlations in Balanced Networks with Unreliable Synapses
Leone, M. J.; Huang, C.; Doiron, B.
Show abstract
Synaptic physiology is highly stochastic in the neocortex: immediately following an action potential, individual synapses release neurotransmitter unreliably, sometimes even failing to release any vesicles. However, theoretical models of neuronal networks typically neglect this well-established feature of biology, especially recurrent networks. In this work, to better understand the effects of synaptic unreliability in recurrent networks, we describe neuronal variability in a balanced network model of non-leaky integrate-and-fire neurons incorporating a Bernoulli model of synaptic release. For arbitrary network size, synaptic unreliability contributes non-negligibly to spike count variability. Most notably, this additional noise is overshadowed by effects on noise correlations. In particular, we find that feedforward and recurrent synaptic reliability have opposite influences on noise correlations: while increased reliability of synaptic input from neurons outside of the network increase correlations, reliability of recurrent synapses de-correlates population activity. We explain this dichotomy by examining the average input currents to cell pairs, and verify this effect with simulations of exponential integrate-and-fire neurons with adaptation and conductance-based synapses. Overall, our results emphasize the importance of synaptic unreliability in the study of noise correlations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Postsynaptic frequency filters shaped by the interplay of synaptic short-term plasticity and cellular time scales 97%
- Correlations in population dynamics in multi-component networks 96%
- Intersegmental coordination of the central pattern generator via interleaved electrical and chemical synapses in zebrafish spinal cord 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.