Back

AI in ECG-Based Electrolyte Imbalance Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Dasdelen, M. F.; Almas, F.; Dasdelen, Z. B.; Yapalak, A. N. B.; Marr, C.

2025-01-10 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.01.09.25320300 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundElectrolyte imbalances significantly affect heart function, making electrocardiography (ECG) a crucial non-invasive tool. This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed AI models diagnostic accuracy for detecting these imbalances from ECG, aiming to enhance early detection and improve cardiac care. MethodsWe searched 9 databases and reference lists. Two reviewers assessed bias via the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Test performance data were extracted into 2x2 tables and pooled estimates of specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model, presented in forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic curves. We explored heterogeneity by meta-regression, examining internal/external datasets and the number of leads. Results21 studies addressing potassium, calcium, and sodium were included. A meta-analysis was conducted only on potassium imbalances (10 studies), covering over 600,000 ECGs from five countries, mostly 12-lead. Among eight studies focused on hyperkalemia, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.856 (95% CI: 0.829-0.879), 0.788 (0.744-0.826), and 21.8 (17.8-26.7). For hypokalemia (six studies), pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR were 0.824 (0.785- 0.856), 0.724 (0.668-0.774), and 12.27 (9.15-16.47). QUADAS-2 assessment showed a 52% high risk of bias in patient selection, mainly due to inadequate sampling details and case-control approaches. ConclusionAI models can detect ECG-based electrolyte abnormalities, particularly hyperkalemia, and valuable in ICU settings requiring frequent electrolyte assessments and in home monitoring for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, larger retrospective and prospective studies across diverse clinical settings, hospitals, ethnic groups, countries, and regions are warranted.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.