Back

PixlMap: A generalisable pixel classifier for cellular phenotyping in multiplex immunofluorescence images

Pennie, R. L.; Mason, D.; Rakovic, K.; Ballantyne, F.; Powley, I. R.; Georgakopoulou, A.; Bird, T. G.; Officer-Jones, L.; Le Quesne, J.

2025-01-13 pathology
10.1101/2025.01.08.632002 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiplexed methods for the detection of protein expression generate extremely data-rich images of intact tissue sections. These images are invaluable for the quantification and analysis of complex biology and biomarker development. However, their interpretation presents a considerable analytical challenge. Cell segmentation from images is a key bottleneck and a major focus of research activity in artificial intelligence. Most current methods depend initially on the use of a nuclear counterstain to identify nuclear boundaries, which is a relatively straightforward task. The cellular boundary is then assigned either by expansion of the nuclear outline, or by the use of membrane or cytoplasm-specific stains to delineate cell boundaries, or by some combination of the two. The task is critical, as inaccurate segmentation leads to information loss and data contamination from neighbouring cells. Increasingly sophisticated methods are being developed to address these issues, but each has its own shortcomings. We present an alternative method which is inspired by the fact that the assignation of a cellular phenotype by eye does not depend upon the accurate identification of cell boundaries. We present an easy-to-use deep learning-based cellular phenotyping method which leverages this human capacity to assign phenotypes without segmenting the entire cell, and which can accurately phenotype cells based on nuclear segmentation alone. Using human ground truth annotations of entire cellular regions, we developed a classifier leveraging the U-Net architecture within a commercially available deep learning image analysis platform, but the principle is transferrable to any deep-learning framework. Crucially, training requires only a single example of each compartmental stain (nuclear/cytoplasmic/membranous). The resulting algorithm assigns class identities to cells with nuclear labelling alone, without the need for whole cell expansion. The method is highly novel, broadly generalisable, and comparable in accuracy to intensity-based phenotyping methods, bridging the gap between inaccurate cellular segmentation and accurate phenotype generation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.8%
4
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
5
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
8
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
12
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
20
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
26
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
27
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
29
Skeletal Muscle
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%