Back

Network-based framework for studying etiology and phenotype diversity in primary ciliopathies

Aarts, E. M.; Laman Trip, D. S.; Neatu, R.; Martin, C. G.; Riley, B.; Kraus, A.; Green, A.; Al-Hamed, M. H.; Armstrong, R. E.; Sayer, J.; Bachmann-Gagescu, R.; Beltrao, P.

2025-01-09 genetics
10.1101/2025.01.08.631887 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in sequencing technologies have increasingly enabled the identification of genetic causes for human monogenic diseases. However, systematic understanding remains limited due to the rarity, genetic heterogeneity, and complex genotype-phenotype relationships of these diseases. Primary ciliopathies are a diverse group of rare disorders caused by variants in genes associated with the cilium, a cellular organelle involved in signaling during development and cell homeostasis. These genetic variants result in a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes involving the brain, eye, kidney and skeleton. It remains unclear to what extent this phenotypic diversity can be attributed to the disease-causing genes and their specific roles in ciliary function. Here, we systematically compared human primary ciliopathies with each other and with mouse phenotypes by propagating known disease genes through a network of protein interactions. Network propagation improved the clustering of primary ciliopathies with shared clinical phenotypes and facilitated the identification of mouse phenotypes closely related to primary ciliopathies due to shared groups of proteins in the interaction network. By leveraging this phenotype-specific approach, we prioritized candidate genes for ciliopathies and identified likely pathogenic variants in CEP43, a novel candidate gene for human primary ciliopathies in three previously unsolved cases. This study demonstrates that network propagation enhances the genetic and phenotypic understanding of primary ciliopathies, aiding in the prioritization of candidate genes and identification of relevant mouse models for these rare disorders, and providing a framework for unraveling shared underlying mechanisms for other rare genetic diseases.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
7
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
10
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
13
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
19
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%