Testing for changes in population trends from low-cost ecological count data
Singer, L.; Caduff, M.; Aebischer, T.; Tabiti, P.; Freiberg, A.; Ingensand, J.; Leuenberger, C.; Wegmann, D.
Show abstract
O_LIAccurate and up-to-date knowledge of population trends is essential for effective biodiversity conservation, as is assessing the impact of conservation measures designed to alter these trends. Estimating population trends is challenging, however, either due to altogether insufficient data or due to so-called noisy data that do not readily allow for standard statistical analyses. In addition, many existing methods require monitoring data over long periods of time, which is in contrast to the quick interventions needed by conservation projects, especially when endangered species are involved. C_LIO_LITo address these issues, we here present birp, a novel Bayesian tool that maximizes the power to test for population trends and changes in trends under arbitrary designs, including the canonical before-after (BA), control-intervention (CI) and before-after-control-intervention (BACI) designs often used to assess conservation impact. Our model builds on classic Poisson and negative binomial models for ecological count data and infers changes in population trends jointly from data obtained with multiple survey methods such as track counts, camera trap surveys, or distance sampling, and also from limited and noisy data not necessarily collected in standardized ecological surveys. By focusing on the change itself, our method side-steps common challenges of estimating population trends and does not need to know about absolute population densities or detection probabilities. birp is open-source and available as both a standalone command line tool as well as an R-package for fast and easy use. C_LIO_LIWe illustrate the power of our tool through extensive simulations and show that changes in trends are accurately estimated under various designs, even when data are noisy and sparse, and thereby enables biodiversity research also in regions that are remote and difficult to access. C_LIO_LIUsing birp, we further test for changes in population trends of Tasmanian devils in Australia and of apex predators and their main prey in the Central African Republic. Based on these results we give general guidelines on survey designs that maximize the power to detect trends. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysing biodiversity observation data collected in continuous time: Should we use discrete- or continuous-time occupancy models? 96%
- Integrated Movement Models for Individual Tracking and Species Distribution Data 95%
- Effectiveness of Joint Species Distribution Models in the Presence of Imperfect Detection 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fitting individual-based models of spatial population dynamics to long-term monitoring data 95%
- Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability 94%
- Modeling Avian Full Annual Cycle Distribution and Population Trends with Citizen Science Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating abundance with interruptions in data collection using open population spatial capture-recapture models 95%
- Using visual encounter data to improve capture-recapture abundance estimates 95%
- Choosing priors in Bayesian ecological models by simulating from the prior predictive distribution 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of spatial overdispersion on confidence intervals for population density estimated by spatial capture-recapture 96%
- Mt or not Mt: Temporal variation in detection probability in spatial capture-recapture and occupancy models 96%
- Accounting for observation biases associated with counts of young when estimating fecundity: case study on the arboreal-nesting red kite (Milvus milvus) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.