Back

Effective prediction of IL-17 inducing peptides using hybrid approach: iIL17pred

Arora, P.; Periwal, N.; Aggarwal, L.; Sood, V.; kaur, B.

2025-01-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.01.08.631619 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundInterleukin 17 (IL-17) plays a crucial role in regulating the immune system and is associated with numerous diseases. Modulating IL-17 levels has demonstrated potential in mitigating disease symptoms, positioning it as a compelling target for drug development. Therefore, identifying and characterizing novel drug molecules capable of influencing IL-17 levels is critical. Recent advances in therapeutic peptides underscore their promise as attractive drug candidates, inspiring the development of IL-17 modulating peptides. ResultsThis study aimed to enhance existing methods for efficiently classifying IL-17 inducing peptides. Positive and negative datasets were obtained from the Immune Epitope Database, and peptide features were extracted using the pfeature algorithm. A three-stage hybrid approach combining BLAST, MERCI, and machine learning techniques was employed to accurately classify IL-17-inducing peptides. ConclusionsExtensive benchmarking experiments revealed that our proposed method outperforms existing techniques i.e IL17eScan, across key performance metrics, including sensitivity, accuracy, and area under the curve-receiver operating characteristics (AUC-ROC). Our algorithm achieved an accuracy of 88.08% and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.68 on an external dataset, significantly surpassing the accuracy of 78.57% and MCC of 0.57 achieved by existing methods under comparable conditions. This demonstrates a substantial improvement in IL-17 peptide classification. The results are accessible via a user-friendly web server (http://www.soodlab.com/iil17pred/). These findings hold significant potential for predicting IL-17-inducing peptides, which can be further validated experimentally.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.