Predicting Personalised Therapeutic Combinations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using In Silico Modelling
Clarke, M. A.; Barker, C. G.; Nicholls, A.; Handler, M. P.; Pickard, L.; Shah, A.; Walter, D.; De Braekeleer, E.; Banerji, U.; Choudhary, J.; Ahmad, S.; McDermott, U.; Hannon, G. J.; Fisher, J.
Show abstract
The disease burden from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) adenocarcinoma is substantial, with around a million new cases diagnosed globally each year, and a 5-year survival rate of less than 20%. A lack of therapeutic options personalized to individual patient genetics, and the targeted therapies that exist quickly succumbing to resistance, leads to high variation in survival. Patient stratification combined with greater personalisation of therapies have the potential to improve outcomes, however, the wide variation in mutations found in NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients mean that experimentally determining suitable treatment combinations is time-consuming and expensive. Here we present an in silico model encompassing tumour intrinsic key oncogenic signalling pathways, including EGFR, AKT, JAK/STAT and WNT for efficiently predicting rational drug-drug and drug-radiotherapy combination therapies in NSCLC. Using this model, we simulate diverse genetic profiles and test over 10,000 therapeutic combinations to identify optimal strategies to overcome resistance mechanisms specific to genetic profiles and p53 status. Our in silico model reproduces drug additivity experiments, predicts radio-sensitising genes validated in a CRISPR screen and identifies 53BP1 as a potential drug target that improves the therapeutic window during radiotherapy, as well as potential to use ATM inhibitors to overcome p53 loss-of-function driven radiotherapy resistance. We further use the in silico model to identify a 19-gene signature to stratify patients most likely to benefit from radiotherapy and validated this using TCGA data. These results further demonstrate the utility of in silico mechanistic modelling and present a bespoke computational resource for large-scale screening of personalised therapies applied to NSCLC.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of machine learning and genome-scale metabolic modeling identifies multi-omics biomarkers for radiation resistance 95%
- Oncogenic RAS activity predicts response to chemotherapy and outcome in lung adenocarcinoma 95%
- Integrative ensemble modelling of cetuximab sensitivity in colorectal cancer PDXs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative analysis of large-scale loss-of-function screens identifies robust cancer-associated genetic interactions 94%
- Clonal transcriptomics identifies mechanisms of chemoresistance and empowers rational design of combination therapies. 93%
- The transcriptomic response of cells to a drug combination is more than the sum of the responses to the monotherapies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Aberrant transcript usage induces homologous recombination deficiency and predicts therapeutic responses 94%
- CIP2A interacts with TopBP1 and is selectively essential for DNA damage-induced basal-like breast cancer tumorigenesis 94%
- Cancer mutational processes vary in their association with replication timing and chromatin accessibility 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.