The Role of de novo and Ultra-Rare Variants in Hirschsprung Disease (HSCR): Extended Gene Discovery for Risk Profiling of Patients
Fu, M.; Berk-Rauch, H. E.; Chatterjee, S.; Chakravarti, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundHirschsprung disease (HSCR) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by disrupted migration and proliferation of enteric neural crest cells during enteric nervous system development. Genetic studies suggest a complex etiology involving both rare and common variants, but the contribution of ultra-rare pathogenic variants (PAs) remains poorly understood. MethodsWe perform whole-exome sequencing (WES) on 301 HSCR probands and 109 family trios, employing advanced statistical methods and gene prioritization strategies to identify genes carrying de novo and ultra-rare coding pathogenic variants. Multiple study designs, including case-control, de novo mutation analysis and joint test, are used to detect associated genes. Candidate genes are further prioritized based on their biological and functional relevance to disease associated tissues and onset period (i.e., human embryonic colon). ResultsWe identify 19 risk genes enriched with ultra-rare coding pathogenic variants in HSCR probands, including four known genes (RET, EDNRB, ZEB2, SOX10) and 15 novel candidates (e.g., COLQ, NES, FAT3) functioning in neural proliferation and neuromuscular synaptic development. These genes account for 17.5% of the population-attributable risk (PAR), with novel candidates contributing 6.5%. Notably, a positive correlation between pathogenic mutational burden and disease severity is observed. Female cases exhibit at least 42% higher ultra-rare pathogenic variant burden than males (P = 0.05). ConclusionsThis first-ever genome-wide screen of ultra-rare variants in a large, phenotypically diverse HSCR cohort highlights the substantial contribution of ultra-rare pathogenic variants to the disease risk and phenotypic variability. These findings enhance our understanding of the genetic architecture of HSCR and provide potential targets for genetic screening and personalized interventions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The individual and global impact of copy number variants on complex human traits 96%
- Advancing long-read nanopore genome assembly and accurate variant calling for rare disease detection 96%
- Tissue and cell-type specific molecular and functional signatures of 16p11.2 reciprocal genomic disorder across mouse brain and human neuronal models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dominant variants in major spliceosome U4 and U5 small nuclear RNA genes cause neurodevelopmental disorders through splicing disruption 94%
- Sequencing of over 100,000 individuals identifies multiple genes and rare variants associated with Crohns disease susceptibility 93%
- Biallelic variants in RNU2-2 cause the most prevalent known recessive neurodevelopmental disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An atlas connecting shared genetic architecture of human diseases and molecular phenotypes provides insight into COVID-19 susceptibility 94%
- Clustering of predicted loss-of-function variants in genes linked with monogenic disease can explain incomplete penetrance 94%
- Multi-modal investigation of the schizophrenia-associated 3q29 genomic interval reveals global genetic diversity with unique haplotypes and segments that increase the risk for non-allelic homologous recombination 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Discordance between a deep learning model and clinical-grade variant pathogenicity classification in a rare disease cohort 93%
- Association between genes regulating neural pathways for quantitative traits of speech and language disorders 93%
- Neurodevelopmental disorders and cancer networks share pathways; but differ in mechanisms, signaling strength, and outcome 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.