Regional Variations in Burden of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Mehareen, J.; Choy, K.; Yin, Y.; Sin, D. D.; Sadatsafavi, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) imposes a significant burden on individuals and communities. While differences in such burden are often studied across countries and healthcare systems, differences within jurisdictions have not been well evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the trends of, and factors explaining, regional variability in the burden of COPD within a well-defined population with publicly funded healthcare system. MethodologyWe used population-based health records of people aged 35 years or older diagnosed with COPD across the 16 health regions of British Columbia, Canada (2010-2020). The primary outcomes were prevalence, incidence, all-cause hospital admissions, and all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes were COPD- and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific hospitalization and mortality. We used generalized linear models to examine how outcomes varied by regions and changed over time, controlling for sex, age, socioeconomic status, and rural/urban residence. ResultsOver the 11-year study period, there were 312,014 individuals diagnosed with COPD (48.1% female, mean baseline age: 68.2 years). Across the province, standardized prevalence and all-cause mortality remained relatively stable during the study period, whereas incidence and all-cause hospitalization declined. There were up to a three-fold difference in standardized incidence and prevalence, and up to a two-fold difference in standardized all-cause hospitalization and mortality across regions (all p<0.05). These differences remained significant after controlling for case mix. Among COPD patients, both CVD-specific hospitalization and mortality were higher compared to COPD-specific hospitalization and mortality. ConclusionDespite being governed by the same universal healthcare system, difference in burden of COPD across geographic regions in this Canadian province was significant. Heterogeneity was more prominent in incidence and prevalence, compared with hospitalization and mortality, suggesting that the variation in the process of care leading to diagnosis is more substantial than variation in COPD outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering-based COPD Subtypes Have Distinct Longitudinal Outcomes and Multi-omics Biomarkers 94%
- Relative Contributions of Family History and a Polygenic Risk Score on COPD and Related Outcomes: COPDGene and ECLIPSE studies 91%
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The protective effect of club cell secretory protein (CC-16) on COPD risk and progression: a Mendelian randomisation study 93%
- Optimised oxygenation improves functional capacity during daily activities in patients with COPD on long-term oxygen therapy – a randomised crossover trial 91%
- Pulmonary Fibrosis after COVID-19 is Associated with Severity of Illness and Blood Leukocyte Telomere Length 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Inhaled corticosteroids downregulate SARS-CoV-2-related gene expression in COPD: results from a RCT 90%
- An individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic blood biomarkers in IPF 90%
- Increased expression of ACE2, the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor, in alveolar and bronchial epithelium of smokers and COPD subjects 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune, metabolic, anatomical, and functional features of people after successful tuberculosis treatment: an exploratory analysis 90%
- Widespread Sexual Dimorphism in the Transcriptome of Human Airway Epithelium in Response to Smoking 90%
- Integrative genetic and genomic networks identify microRNA associated with COPD and ILD 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.