Back

Heart rate fragmentation improves general anesthesia state classification using machine learning

Aude, J.-C.; Fauchereau, C.; Carimalo, F.; Merienne, A.; Laffon, M.; Godat, E.

2025-01-08 anesthesia
10.1101/2025.01.07.25320157 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate assessment of consciousness during general anesthesia is crucial for optimizing anesthetic dosage and patient safety. Current electroencephalogram-based monitoring devices can be inaccurate or unreliable in specific surgical contexts (e.g. cephalic procedures). This study investigated the feasibility of using electrocardiogram (ECG) features and machine learning to differentiate between awake and anesthetized states. A cohort of 48 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia at the Tours hospital was recruited. ECG-derived features were extracted, including spectral power, heart rate variability and complexity metrics, as well as heart rate fragmentation indices (HRF). These features were augmented by a range of physiological variables. The aim was to evaluate a number of machine learning algorithms in order to identify the most appropriate method for classifying the awake and anesthetized states. The gradient boosting algorithm achieved the highest accuracy (0.84). Notably, HRF metrics exhibited the strongest predictive power across all models tested. The generalizability of this ECG-based approach was further assessed using public datasets (VitalDB, Fantasia, and MIT-BIH Polysomnographic), achieving accuracies above 0.80. This study provides evidence that ECG-based classification methods can effectively distinguish awake from anesthetized states, with HRF indices playing a pivotal role in this classification. Author summaryGeneral anesthesia monitoring is critical for optimizing patient safety and outcomes. While electroencephalogram (EEG)-based systems are commonly used, they have limitations in accuracy and applicability, particularly in cases where EEG electrodes placement is challenging or impossible, such as during cephalic surgeries or when patients have forehead skin lesions. Here, a novel approach using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals and machine learning techniques was used to differentiate between awake and anesthetized states during surgery. A total of 48 patients undergoing surgical procedures under general anaesthesia at the Tours hospital were selected for inclusion in the study. This investigation focused on heart rate fragmentation indices, metrics designed for assessing biological versus chronological age, derived from ECG recordings. The gradient boosting algorithm demonstrates performance comparable to leading methods reported in the literature for this classification task. Importantly, model generalizability was confirm through successful application to publicly available datasets. This article highlights the potential of ECG signals as an alternative source for deriving depth of anesthesia indices, offering increased versatility in clinical settings where EEG monitoring is challenging or contraindicated.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.2%
2
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
6
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
23
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%