Back

Evaluation of Flow Control Using PID versus Fuzzy Logic in an Electropneumatic Circuit for Pulmonary Ventilation Applications

Molino, J. J.; Lescher, A.; Gonzalez, L.; Griffith, I.; Rojas, A.; Quijano, D.

2025-01-08 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.01.07.25320144 medRxiv
Show abstract

High-tech commercial mechanical ventilators are designed to provide a constant and accurate flow, thus ensuring the precision of ventilatory treatment. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the flow control in a prototype electro-pneumatic unit for mechanical ventilator applications using a PID versus a Fuzzy Logic method. Specifically, the intention is to determine if there is evidence of superior performance of fuzzy logic control over PID in this application. For this reason, the methodology is based on measurement and numerical analysis. The design of this research is quasi-experimental and conducted in a laboratory. Thus, samples of the data of the variables were taken at convenience under a pre-established scheme and conditions. In terms of the type of study, it is considered quantitative, experimental, and applied. The main results show that according, the Bland-Altman analysis both controllers meet the accuracy limits of commercial equipment. However, the fuzzy logic controller presented better standard deviation and difference limits, demonstrating greater reliability in the accuracy of results. Additionally, the PID control demonstrated quicker response times with a shorter settling time (between 0.32 and 0.43 seconds) than in the fuzzy logic control (between 0.43 and 0.77 seconds); moreover, the fuzzy control presents an improvement in the volume of 900 mL, highlighting the efficiency of this controller in conditions of higher demand. The results show that both the PID and Fuzzy Logic controllers meet the stability conditions of the Jury Test. The systems poles are within the unit circle of the Z plane, confirming the controllers stability. Also, the curve of the fuzzy control in the Nyquist analysis is farther away from the origin and from the point (-1, 0j) than the curve of the PID control, indicating better stability and a more robust system against variations or disturbances.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.8%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.4%
4
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.9%
5
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.6%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
8
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Virology Journal
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
16
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
30
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%