Back

Optimal sparsity in autoencoder memory models of the hippocampus

Shah, A.; Hen, R.; Losonczy, A.; Fusi, S.

2025-01-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.06.631574 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Storing complex correlated memories is significantly more efficient when memories are recoded to obtain compressed representations. Previous work has shown that compression can be implemented in a simple neural circuit, which can be described as a sparse autoencoder. The activity of the encoding units in these models recapitulates the activity of hippocampal neurons recorded in multiple experiments. However, these investigations have assumed that the level of sparsity is fixed and that inputs have the same statistics and, hence, that they are uniformly compressible. In contrast, biological agents encounter environments with vastly different memory demands and compressibility. Here, we investigate whether the compressibility of inputs determines optimal sparsity in sparse autoencoders. We find 1) that as the compressibility of inputs increases, the optimal coding level decreases, 2) that the desired coding level diverges from the observed coding level as a function of both memory demand and input compressibility, and 3) that optimal memory capacity is achieved when sparsity is weakly enforced. In addition, we characterize how sparsity and the strength of sparsity enforcement jointly control optimal performance. These results provide predictions for how sparsity in the hippocampus should change in response to environmental statistics and theoretical grounds for why sparsity is dynamically tuned in the brain.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
19.3%
3
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.6%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.4%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
9
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
13
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
17
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.5%
23
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
25
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%