Back

Mutation experiments with AcrB and MexB D408A mutants * indicate the efflux liability of antibiotics

Piddock, L. J.; Ricci, V.; Ciusa, M. L.

2025-01-06 microbiology
10.1101/2025.01.06.631490 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe showed that exposure of an AcrB D408A mutant to efflux inhibitors applied evolutionary pressure to select bacteria with the wild type acrB sequence. This suggested that reversion to wild type can differentiate between efflux inhibitors. Thus, we hypothesized that this experiment could identify inhibitors of the primary RND pump, AcrB or its homologues in other species. ObjectivesTo construct three mutants, Escherichia coli AcrB D408A, Klebsiella pneumoniae AcrB D408A and Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexB D408A and expose the mutants to substrates and non-substrates of AcrB and/or MexB and determine the rate of reversion to wildtype acrB/mexB sequence. MethodsMutant Escherichia coli AcrB D408A, Klebsiella pneumoniae AcrB D408A and Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexB D408A were constructed with site-directed mutagenesis of the relevant nucleotide in the acrB/mexB gene. Mutants were exposed on agar to substrates and the mutation frequency and mutation rate determined. The MIC of antibiotics and the presence/absence of the D408A substitution was determined for mutants. ResultsExposure to the AcrB substrates chlorpromazine and minocycline reverted the D408A genotypes to wild type in a species-dependent manner. Exposure to a non-AcrB substrate, spectinomycin, did not select wild type acrB. Chlorpromazine selected for wild type acrB K. pneumoniae as it had for S. Typhimurium, whereas minocycline selected for wild type E. coli acrB. None of the antibiotics selected wild type mexB, including the tested MexB substrates. ConclusionsEvolutionary paths depend upon the genetic background of the species and availability of alternative routes/genetic pathways that can confer resistance/decreased susceptibility to antibiotics.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
2
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
29
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%