Back

High genetic diversity and no detectable founder effects following a rapid range expansion of a long-distance migrant (Acrocephalus scirpaceus)

Bergman, N. M.; Lehikoinen, P.; Kluen, E.; Bensch, S.; Lo Cascio Saetre, C.; Eroukhmanoff, F.; Fossoy, F.; Prochazka, P.; Smith, W. J.; Stokke, B. G.; Primmer, C. R.; Thorogood, R.; Ronka, K.

2025-01-06 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.01.06.631438 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many species are currently experiencing range shifts in response to changing environmental conditions, but with potentially serious genetic consequences. Repeated founder events and strong genetic drift are expected to erode genetic variation at the range front, reducing adaptive potential and slowing or even halting the expansion. However, the severity of these consequences for the more common and highly mobile species undergoing environment-driven range shifts (c.f. invasions) is less clear. Here we combined historical observations and contemporary movement data of the common reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) with genomic evidence from across its European breeding range to (1) infer the origin and (2) quantify the genetic consequences of a recent and rapid northward range expansion. While there were no reductions in levels of nucleotide diversity or allelic richness, nor a signal of founder effect in the directionality index ({psi}), our combined dataset approach was able to infer an expansion origin from the southwest. Furthermore, we found that private allelic richness retained a slight but significant linear decline along the colonisation route. These results suggest that high dispersal capabilities can allow even philopatric species to avoid the loss of genetic diversity during rapid range expansions. Nevertheless, if multiple lines of evidence enable identification of an expansion pathway, we may still detect genetic signals of expansion.

Published in Molecular Ecology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.